I would like to weigh in by pointing out that Classic Motorsports magazine is primarily an entertainment periodical and not an historical document by any reasonable stretch of the imagination. The article, although written by an extremely credible source, is written and presented as a story, an opinion, commentary, and recollection. For instance, if BRE corresponded directly with Nissan engineering directly, of course Nissan would present the described, interpreted reaction. Alan's quote above is a perfect illustration. Peter Brock offers no indication of what Nissan or Mr. Katayama were "aware"; only his opinion or perception, recollection of those days so many years ago. For that matter, even his own engines were extensively modified; balanced, cc'd, ported, polished, only resembling what was delivered and sold to the public. Of course Peter saved the day. He's the greatest. Just ask him. A true disciple in the very image of his mentor, Carroll Shelby, who incidentally, snaked the Toyota 2000GT racing program away from Peter. The reader has to take all of this with a large dose of salt, as they say. Great entertainment, great story, probably mostly true, but not factually substantiated to qualify as gospel, let alone 'history'.