Zed Head

Looks like the rubber insulator at the top of the strut broke, letting the wheel drop. You can probably see the remains above the tire with a light. There's room to get your head in there now. The dropped wheel is causing the u-joints in the halfshaft to bind, that's where the bumpy rotation comes from.

The plate is clamped between the engine and transmission. Coatings tend to creep or flow over time. Better doublecheck transmission bolt tightness over time after installing. Generally, metal mating surfaces should not be painted. It it were mine, I'd scrape all of the coating off where the two surfaces mate. Besides that,why would you powdercoat a part that's buried from sight. Just seems odd. Oh well. Seems to fit the seller's MO though.

Removing the gas cap unseals the tank.

I'd be interested but I don't want to go through the hassle of removing the filler neck. I'd guess that many others are avoiding it also. I even spent time devising a way to add a narrow unleaded filler neck inside my existing filler neck so that I wouldn't have to remove it. Fuel tank work is a major pain.

Pretty sure it's in here. Didn't go through it but I remember discussing it.

The mousetrap springs put a small amount of pressure on the cam lobe circle, the part of the lobe that should have lash (a gap). But if you're seeing extensive wear the lash might have decreased to zero. This can happen when valve seats wear. The simple thing to do is to measure lash, using feeler gauges. That will tell you if you have a big problem. Always a good idea to check lash on a regular basis anyway. But, the gold coloration could just be oil residue left over because lash is correct and there is no wear to rub it off. As it should be. If it's oil residue you'll be able to polish it off easily.

The engine bay is also exposed from underneath. Behind the wheels for sure, everywhere if the splash pan is removed. I'd spray there first.

You could remove the gas cap and try air pressure at the outlet. 90 psi might pop the film off of the pickup end. Shouldn't hurt anything. A rubber tipped air nozzle should allow you to get full pressure in to the tube.

You're on mile #25 of the marathon. So close.

That's only 5 things. I'd do the simple ones first - radio harness, heater harness, A/T indicator. The tail lights are on the other side of the Hazard switch so things kind of re-expand on the other side of it. You can unplug the Hazard switch but you won't know if it's the switch or the lights. Or just do the Hazard switch first. Down to 5, almost there.

C-1, C-2, and C-3 are all on the Green-White wire circuit. Each one is a "branch". SteveJ's method of measuring current would save you fuses and get you to the solution quickest, probably. But, another way to narrow things down would be to unplug all three connectors, then turn the light switch on. If the fuse still blows, then you can ignore everything on 1, 2 and 3 and focus on the things not on those connectors. If it doesn't blow, plug each connector in, separately. Since current will be reduced with only one connector working, the fuse still may not blow. You have to blow several fuses plugging and unplugging connectors until you find one that always causes the fuse to blow. Your big dilemma is that you don't seem to have a dead short (low resistance) that blows a fuse a immediately. You apparently have a high resistance short circuit. It's flowing more current than it should but not enough to blow the fuse immediately. That makes your problem much more difficult to solve. If you even have a short. You might just have too many things on the circuit and dirty fuse connections. Dirty connections cause heat, which can be enough to melt a fuse. Keep track of what you do and what happens. Your observation about the dimmer switch was a good one, showing that you don't have a dead short (direct path to ground). Write those odd things down and you'll probably realize something.

Also, the back of the fuse and its connections at the fuse box have a tendency to corrode and get hot. Many 240Z's have a warped fuse cover over certain fuses. You might check the back of the fuse box.

I think that's a good analogy. Also why more fuses blow when it's really hot out. Take a look at this fragment of a diagram I copied. The GW wire that gets hot feeds many small lights. Any single one of which could be your short. It also shows why C-3 didn't turn everything off. I put a red dot next to each branch. I think that you were on the right track by unplugging things. You just need to keep unplugging until the problem goes away. Here's one diagram source, a GIF file from atlanticz - http://atlanticz.ca/zclub/techtips/electrical.htm I used the pdf version from here - http://www.nicoclub.com/FSM/260z/1974/

But, it's in the ballpark of some people's used - http://www.datsunstore.com/oiler-7077-used-p-1429.html Feel like I should buy up those NOS parts and sell them for $150. easy money, but probably take ten years to break even. Here's the billet bar - http://www.datsunstore.com/oiler-7077-billet-aluminum-p-1428.html

Is that a Fairlady radio panel? Volume control on the right? Edit - I'm still not really clear on what "Fairlady" actually means. Pretty sure they're right-hand drive...

Good example though, of how Nissan kept modifying their wiring.

Looks nice. Still spendy, and it seems like the 280Z design is still available. Maybe that's why he put something on the page about drilled holes being better than stamped. Not really seeing it though, since the tiny oil orifice in the block (edited head) is what restricts flow. http://www.nissanpartsdeal.com/parts/nissan-tube-oil-cam~13100-e3004.html

Not really, what you did is still informative. I was trying to figure out how you got voltage from the alternator to the battery with your main link blown. No need to do it over, you've shown that the alternator works correctly. So if that link is blown then you must have been backfeeding through the other link or through other stuff wired in to the harness. According to the 1975 diagram the only other way in to the positive terminal is through the EFI circuit. Not really sure how it backfeeds in that way. I would measure resistance to ground on both sides of the main link that blew. If you have a short to ground it will just blow again.

72 or 77? I've noticed that Nissan seemed to do different wiring schemes over the years. On my 76, they run power directly from the alternator to the fusible link and to the fuse box. If the diagram I'm looking at is right (it shows the a red fusible link as the main one and black as a secondary - I think Saridout got the colors backward). 75 only has two links at the terminal blocks, they went to four in 76. So if the main one blows, the fuse box is all that gets power.

Forgot to say, his VR could still be bad. He had charge, maybe backfeeding, then it goes away. I'm guessing he has a short, it fried his VR, and he's been getting backfeeding through the ignition circuit. Just playing the solve-the-problem game...

He smoked an OE link the first time, I think. I'd use the meter and see if one side is shorted to ground before going too far. Easy to do.

I was writing the above while posts were being posted. Not sure where it fits in to the latest data. Still, fusible links should never burn (that's why the Maxifuse upgrade seems like a fruitless endeavor, to me). I've never burnt one. So, your real concern should be about what caused the link to blow. Examine all of the wires involved for insulation breaks and contact to ground.

When you measured the 16.47 volts, was that at the A terminal, not the battery terminal? 1975 feeds two links directly, one from the alternator and the other after the Ammeter. The Black Alt/Ign. Relay link is the main charging wire, although I'd think it might backfeed through the green Ignition link, which might explain why you're still getting some charging. Maybe the meter is the problem after all. The Black link is fed through the Ammeter. If the Ammeter was shorted it would blow the link as battery current passed through it. Whatever is going on, you must have a short somewhere. http://atlanticz.ca/zclub/techtips/electrical.htm http://atlanticz.ca/zclub/techtips/fusiblelinks/index.html

Just thought this is odd. Seen it before with other words in other threads. "Disassembling" converted to "stripping". And the original thread wasn't edited. Edit - Maybe it's Tapatalk. Whatever that is.

Do you mean regulator, not meter? When you connected F to A you had the voltage regulator (VR) out of the system ( I assume that you unplugged the F-N plug to do the test). I would remove the regulator and post a picture of it. See if you can tell if it's the original points VR, or a newer solid-state unit. Not really sure how the originals typically fail. Solid-state components can do odd things when they go bad though.