Jump to content

IGNORED

Petronix Ignition Module


RCR Z

Recommended Posts


That's a pretty cool fix, although it's not directly what Ian was implying, I think.  I think he was trying to weaken the magnetic field by removing loops.  You made it weaker by making it bigger, which you probably could have done with multiple loops too.  Now that I see it again, I remember that that type of fix is out there on the internet, in various forums.  But as I recall it, they were adding more loops.

Anyway, why don't they just put that in their instructions?  How many sale do they lose because of tach problems, I wonder?  I'm surprised that Pertronix actually has a capable support person.  A rarity in today's world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I've never held an early tach with my own two hands, so this is mostly engineering speculation, but I would go something like this...

The early tachs ran the coil current to the tach. And (now that I've seen that picture), I would surmise that they used an inductive pickup for the tach to sense the ignition pulses. Just like the inductive pickup on your timing light. It senses current that flows through a wire, and just like your timing light, it does that by wrapping a "sensor" around the wire your interested in. Also the same as your clamp-on ammeter you use for house wiring to measure the current being drawn by your beer fridge.

So that thing on the back of the tach is the inductive pickup, and the white wire running through it is the one being sensed.

So now the real guessing starts... I'm guessing that the inductive pickup on the back of the tach is relatively cheap and prone to crosstalk and/or wave shape. I'm thinking that there may have been some crosstalk from the portion of the wire NOT looped through the sensor that was messing with the sensing of the wire that WAS looped trough the pickup. So by moving the loop of wire farther away from the pickup, it reduced the crosstalk or changed the wave shape just enough that the tach likes is better.

Kinda hard to do that kind of analysis with no parts like that here though. Could be totally off, but until someone has something better......    LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.