26th-Z

I think this is what you are talking about?

That would probably be a January 1970 manufacture date.

The FRP headlight case 63115 (and 63116) - E4100 was applied to models up to 6/72 and steel (63115 and 6) - N3000 thereafter. After all the reading I have done, I have concluded that "FRP" (which stands for fiberglass reinforced plastic) and "fiberglass" are one in the same term. I have seen aftermarket "fiberglass" reproductions and they are obviously fiberglass matt with exposed weave. Original cases were manufactured using the same process as molded stadium seats. FRP was chosen as the material for reason of weight and complexity in shaping the case in metal at that time.

That's why I replied to the comment about the driving lights. What a great looking car! #22 belongs to Nick Mason I believe. Ever notice how pleasing the kit-car looks on the S30? Coincidence?

Typically French. Could be Belgian also.

Fog lamps / driving lamps like these? Or these? Or these?

Pretty good article. I would recommend John's book; "Stainless Steel Carrot".

I think it would be difficult to associate the paint schemes, John, but you have an interesting point. Wouldn't it be nice to know about when and where Yasukawa's picture was taken. None-the-less, the BRE picture predates the Yasukawa photo. The BRE picture is circa 1970-1971 and the Yasukawa picure is circa 1972-1973. I suspect the top of the Yasukawa car is red with the lower portion of the fender stripe dark blue, just like the BRE car.

Hey! Good to see you Allan! I have been looking for your archive. In fact, Mike sent me an e-mail a couple of months ago wondering if my link still worked (which it didn't). It a really good resource. Best encouragement for getting it up and running again. Let us know!

I typed "Scarab" in the search bar and went back to 2005 to find this thread. There have been many conversations about the famous Scarabs on this site and well worth the search. My friend ZRush had a Scarab. Good luck with your restoration!

Yea, what the hell are you doing? One of my major complaints about one of my favorite threads is that there is very little information or description of the picture; when, where, who, etc. Every photo just seems to scream; "Tell me more! More!" Perhaps it's not a complaint rather a disappointment. As Alan aptly points out, "aero" was in its infancy at the time and tire grip was the difficult point when the cars became more efficient. There was a tremendous amount of experimentation going on. I just have to re-post this picture. Look at that left front tire. Is that awesome or what!?!! Stand on it!

I want to point out to you that there are two types of wheel cover so that you don't mistakenly buy a mismatching one. The spacing and number of wheel grips on the back are different and they reflect the location of the valve stem hole. Either between the spokes or centered on a spoke. It looks like your valve stem hole is between the spoke. Good luck in your hunt!

Isn't that interesting to have the list of tools document!? I don't recall ever seeing one of those. The crescent wrench is still in the bag! Fabulous! We have had discussions in the past about the tools. I finally found my picture collection, probably all from the archives but I can't find the threads! Oh bother! I wish I could tell you more but these pictures should give you an idea of what you may encounter.

jerz, Finding authentic tools is going to be a task. All cars came with the tire changing tools from your top list (which later included a spare set of four lug nuts). If you look at your part listings you will note that the rest are"op" optional and I am not aware that they were ever part of the basic kit. I know several people who collect them and your quest is admirable. Please share pictures of what you find. I collect dealer service tools. I have two boxes and a number of tools.

Just a thought; the fuel filler hose is different for the 2+2 models. I wonder if these are the only hoses still available.

You guys are still at it!?! A whole-nother page worth! Alan, you gotta quit baiting these....ah...intellectuals. You have their panties all in a wad!

You may have a point, Zed Head, particularly with respect to implied generalities, i.e. name-calling. But the reaction holds the indications you describe. Someone got their button pushed, don't you think? The post delete suggestion is an attack on free speech plain and simple. That deplorable suggestion is the sort of thing that is fatal to a forum like this. I'm guilty of many crimes, but I have never silenced someone.

Here, here to your reply to grabmyknot, Alan! For what price does ignorance offer the world of opinion? Shutter my word, I beseech thee, as I regret that I have but only one brake caliper to give for my Z! I was hoping that we might have an intellectual conversation about the cross-flow headed monster. I am so disappointed to read the remarks of disdain. Yes, in fact, the PS30 does outperform the S30 to which it would be properly (intelligently) compared. It outperforms the HLS30 without having to be breathed on, and, the marque has racing provenance not equitably shared by the 240Z. Finally, I completely disagree with the opinion that the basic car is worth only $20,000.

Hi Kats Yes, I have the early crankshaft with six counter weights. My engine numbers are L24-2338 (26th-Z) and L24-2162 (27th-Z). Service bulletin TS70-28 (August 1970) indicates that beginning with engine number L24-3607, eight counterweights were used. My engines also have three different lengths of cylinder head bolts as described in service bulletin TS70-15 (April, 1970) which indicates that from engine number L24-04257, two lengths of cylinder head bolts were used. I was lucky enough to find the three different lengths when I rebuilt the engine. One spot weld appears to be deeper than the other. Perhaps the spot weld machine was not working properly or it did not stay in contact long enough.

Greetings jerz, surprisingly wonderful response. Your scan of the parts manual invited me to look in mine. This may be the thread you refer; My North American Export Parts Catalog (HLS30 - USA and Canada) reveals 4 results for a rear spoiler; 98100-E4600, E4601, N3300 and N3525.

No takers on this subject, eh? Try bre2.net or classicdatsun.com You may have to contact Peter or Les to find out if their spoilers have the raised area for the emblems. I'll bet the BRE "original style" spoiler has it.

Well, your name is Mud, isn't it? Where in my sentence is there any mention of you personally? Look, zhead240 has a really nice car that he paid a lot of money for. Would you like it if your mechanic repaired your nice car the way you suggested? Chill out, dude. Drink a beer and enjoy your ride.

Yes, just pull the radiator out and take it to a radiator shop. Normal maintenance and repair. Don't butcher up your lovely car with a replacement 3-row with a shroud. Or, JB Weld? What on earth are you thinking?

mj, The link doesn't tell you very much and the PDF doesn't open. The Nissan Model S30 Parts Catalog for USA and Canada lists the F4W71a (with final drive 3.364) 32010-E4650 up to 8/71. The F4W71b - 32010-E8850 replaces the a type from 9/71. Then, two transmission listings, 32010-E8851 and E8852 also noted as F4W71b are noted up to 6/72 They also have a 3.364 final drive. From 7/72, the F4W71B 32010-N3300 was installed.

Ha! That is so like you to collect parts that you will probably never need! If you ever get the opportunity, I would like to know how well it is balanced. When I rebuilt the engine for 26th, I had the crankshaft, flywheel, and front pulley balanced together. I do not know the specs but the machinist told me that I would enjoy the balancing work and that the crankshaft was much better.