240260280

It's "Slosh". When the car accelerates, the fuel sloshes to the back side of the bowl, when the car decelerates, the fuel sloshes to the front. This causes the float to change its height slightly. The acceleration also affects the float. If acceleration of water places more at the back wall of the bowl, the water pressure will push the float towards the front of the bowl (put a rubber duck in a bucket of water then spin it on a turntable. The Duck will be forced towards the centre|). It is a very complex physics problem and the key is that it affects both carbs in the opposite way due to hinge location asymmetry.

I don't think the shape of the float that is submerged is an issue unless part of it binds. It is all about height of fuel below the bridge in the throat of the carb. Is there a problem with binding that needs the weights? Denser fuel will cause the float to sit higher.

I think that pyramid chart is skewed... the centre should be the left side lol. BBC and NPR have gone that way long ago.... CBC is a cesspool.

better way

10 to 20 ohms should be fine. You can go straight on to a 9V battery for short busts of a few seconds then let the injector cool. Just keep the switch and battery far enough away from the spay as a spark would be no fun. BACK FLOW IS KEY

open them with a 9v battery through a resistor then shoot carb cleaner backwards through them.

For quick and dirty float level setting, I just blow into the fuel passage and tilt the float until the air is blocked. I then just adjust the float tab so that this stop point occurs when the float is perpendicular to the float tower. The only delta from in use is if my air flow is ~3psi. The nice thing about this process is that it is independent of tower type.... and this is the confusing part as a long tower will have less fuel in the bowl than a short tower. 72 Carbs are just too crazy for my brain to understand. The design could be for dealing with acceleration/deceleration and float swing/fuel slosh but it could also be some weird way to deal with the problem of vapour lock and having less fuel to soak up the heat.... my head spins! Remember those copper crush washers in the rear hub to cure noise?

The media are just parrots with agendas. Investigative reporting is long gone. Journalists are mostly poorly educated these days and filled with poisonous ideas. They also have time machines that cherry pick the good from now and apply it to the past with no understanding. News and journalism is $^!#.

Earliest report on outbreak that I could find (Dec.30 2019): Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-pneumonia-idUSKBN1YZ0GP Associated Press: https://apnews.com/article/health-international-news-china-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-epidemics-00c78d1974410d96fe031f67edbd86ec

Look at PPE they are wearing and at the same time saying it is not transmissible to humans? BS Here is Ebola PPE and "non-transmissible Wuhan Dec 2019 PPE" EBOLA WUHAN DEC 2019 First video of outbreak on Youtube Jan 4 2020

over 1 yer ago.... just say'n

I know for a fact that Fauci pushed Remdesiver when its limited trails showed no benefits. He made it part of the standard treatment in the early days Q2, 2020. I knew he was with with big Pharma then... he is evil.

CAN YOU HANDLE THE TRUTH? It is slowly revealing itself!!!!

You two look great together... you are following Grannyknot's lead Red & Silver is spot on! @grannyknot

Some people were fearful of Jenner and Pasture when they first "invented" vaccines. Some people were fearful of telephones spreading germs when they first were invented. It is normal for some people in society to be more cautious... a survival instinct.

Because the better vaccines efficacy are ~95% (Moderna & Pfizer). This means that 95% exposed to the virus will not test positive but 5% of those vaccinated and are exposed to the virus will get the disease and test positive. Fortunately most of those will be asymptomatic and show no symptoms (and feel well), but others may exhibit some symptoms. Stats show that nearly all who show symptoms will have mild case due to the way vaccines prepare the body to battle new pathogens on entry. This is why the vaccines are great. Unfortunately J&J and AstraZenica vaccines are less effective ~ 60% so most with these shots can still test positive if exposed and also spread the disease as well as get mildly sick. For these scientific AND LOGICAL reasons, it is best practice to continue wearing a mask until most in a region are vaccinated with the better vaccines or the virus is eradicated in a region then all entering into that"clean" region are tested on entry. UK will have a longer battle to snuff out the virus as they are mostly AZ jabbed and only ~60% will be safe, the other ~40% of them will continue to spread the virus about among themselves unless they continue to wear masks to stop this. The good news is that with ~80% vaccinated with the 95% efficacy, heard immunity will eradicate the virus in those regions. These models with shown over a year ago. In our province, we had our active case counts to 0 for most of 2020 (with no one vaccinated) but our idiot PM (who controlled airports under FED Govt) continued to let untested people fly in with the virus. He is an evil ****er to have done this and the deaths and illnesses here are mostly due to him.