sblake01 Posted February 24, 2009 Share #13 Posted February 24, 2009 That would be an 81-83 ZX non turbo engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefmd Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share #14 Posted February 25, 2009 That poses a dilemma. I assume that everything associated outside of the engine is 78 280Z ie AFM, FI, etc. Timing should be setup for a 81-83ZX? The distributor is not from a ZX. What else should I be concerned with as far as setting up the engine to run correctly. Or am I being overly concerned. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted February 25, 2009 Share #15 Posted February 25, 2009 Perhaps you could post some detailed engine pictures and let the experts here identify which specific components you have. Since it's possible to mix and match just about everything there's no way to be certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiefmd Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share #16 Posted February 25, 2009 I'm attempting to attached photos. Lets hope they take. If not I have posted pictures in My Album under 1978 280Z Engine. Again thank you for all your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblake01 Posted February 25, 2009 Share #17 Posted February 25, 2009 That's definately a P79 judging by the hole for the cylinder head temp sensor which you won't use on a 78 so you need to plug that. Other than that, use the 78 specs as far as tune up and the components that match the 78s electronics and fuel system and you shouldn't have any problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beandip Posted February 25, 2009 Share #18 Posted February 25, 2009 (edited) Blake - The head number is P79 and block is N42. Thanks again for all the input.The P-79 head is not from a turbo engine first off. I have the same head. P-79 is from a normally aspirated engine. The head has diamond shaped exhaust ports. The turbo head have square ports and are P-90 or P-90A heads. The block could vary well be a '78 or '79. Both have dished pistons. '81 - '83ZX blocks have flat topped pistons and are marked F-54. L-28 blocks all have dished pistons unless modified. The P-79 head is a 8.3 to 1 , or there abouts, on a F-54 block where it came from. On a dish piston block , unless it has been milled it would be a low compression combination. Edited February 25, 2009 by beandip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblake01 Posted February 25, 2009 Share #19 Posted February 25, 2009 (edited) That's what I said (kind of). What I meant to say in post 13 is that would be an 81-83 ZX non turbo head rather than engine but I did say non turbo. The block could be anywhere from 75-80 since it's a N42 but with the high number it's likely 78-79 like you said Edited February 25, 2009 by sblake01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Beck Posted February 25, 2009 Share #20 Posted February 25, 2009 The block could vary well be a '78 or '79. Both have dished pistons. '81 - '83ZX blocks have flat topped pistons and are marked F-54. L-28 blocks all have dished pistons unless modified. ??????????????N42 blocks all have dished pistons unless modified - -FWIW,Carl B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblake01 Posted February 25, 2009 Share #21 Posted February 25, 2009 I saw that too, Gary, but I overlooked it because I knew what you meant to say in the third sentence based on the first two sentences. In fact, it was clearer than what I said in post 13 and then corrected in post 19. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=Enigma= Posted February 25, 2009 Share #22 Posted February 25, 2009 Asuming dished pistons, a Nissan or 1mm gasket, no shaving of the head or reshaping of the combustion chamber, this combo would put you somewhere between 7.31 to 7.46 compression. That's pretty low and not a great combo IMHO.http://www.atlanticz.ca/zclub/techtips/calcs/engine%20builder/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblake01 Posted February 25, 2009 Share #23 Posted February 25, 2009 But you could probably start it with a hand crank:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=Enigma= Posted February 26, 2009 Share #24 Posted February 26, 2009 But you could probably start it with a hand crank:) Good one Stephen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now