HS30-H

Yes, I have seen that. On the other hand, from Nissan (Japan) parts manual C-235: *343266 - 0501P - RESERVOIR - oil. Worth noting that they were specified for other Nissan models before the S30. Maybe try - if you possibly can - to keep your powder dry. Not doing so can lead to a damp squib (cf 'Cad' plating).

Nissan called this item an 'Oil Reservoir', rather than a "Grease Reservoir". 'Oil' has a little more natural disposition toward moving downhill when subjected to gravity than 'Grease' does. A clue in the name they chose, perhaps? Somebody whose opinion I usually take notice of suggested that the originals - when new - were compliant enough to be 'squeezable'.

Garage 44 and BRING A TRAILER will know exactly what is happening, and when. So if you really want to know I suggest you contact them direct(ly). While you have their attention you might like to suggest a start date and time that fits your busy diary schedule. Clearly you're just gagging to make a bid.

That would apply to most ergonomics. Designers, engineers, architects and even shoe makers have to work within reasonable percentiles. Anybody outside the norms is just going to have to cope with what nature gave them. A little late for April 1st. I'l cite Karl Benz, Johan Sebastian Bach, Johannes Gutenberg and Milli Vanilli as five Germans who - like Albrecht Goertz - are not responsible for a single curve or line on the S30-series Z. "Stolen"? Meh. Language of fools.

Also, Japanese market variants had the option of factory stereo from beginning of production, so there are speaker holes in both sides of the interior quarter panel trims and the sheetmetal underneath them was designed to accept speaker mounts on both sides.

I have no idea what "bait" you are imagining you see. I made a couple of - I judge, having sat in front of the very people who came up with the parts in question, listened to their reasoning and their answers to sensible questions - informed comments on the topic. Contrast this with your finger-in-the-air type ruminations (yes, maybe they have indeed "considered" the transmission issue...) and you're talking about "bait"? Thanks for the grammar lesson (LOL, is that all you've got?). I'm English - more specifically a Londoner - and that's how we tend to say it over here. You might as well be advising Miles Davis to stick to the melody. But if you're suddenly volunteering to be this site's speeling and grammer policeman then by all means go for it. Citizens will demand fair and equal treatment of all cases. Good luck with that.

This is a NISMO project, intended as part of an anniversary of their founding year. THAT is the timing context. I very much doubt that NISMO (it's not a NISSAN product) paid too much attention to what's "already out there". Most of the people carping and whining about the NISMO kit didn't buy an OSG or Datsunworks head either.

I attended a presentation on the new kit at NISMO's Omori HQ last week, and the bellhousing/transmission question was brought up. NISMO's staff said that the FJ20 engine's bellhousing can be used (it's pretty much the same as the one used on the LY crossflow) allowing the 71-B family transmissions to be used, but they expect the aftermarket to step up and adapt 71-C family and NISMO 6-speed transmissions in the way that, for example, ESCORT have done for the L6 family. One thing that strikes me is that people are talking as though individuals will be able to purchase these kits/parts for their own home builds. That's not how NISMO told us they intend to release them. They are going to appoint known, recommended and trusted engine building companies as authorised buyers and they will be given technical assistance with the builds. It will be up to these authorised builders to deal with customers who want to purchase finished engines/drivetrains/complete packages. NISMO won't be selling these parts direct to civilians...

Not odd at all. It's the same reason that British Standard threads were used on a "Japanense" car in the 1950s and early 1960s. Nissan's tie-up with Austin. Wait 'til you hear about Imperial wheel diameters and PCDs... https://www.nissan-global.com/EN/HERITAGE_COLLECTION/short_story/en_p13-01.html

Known to challenge The Hackenthorpe Book Of Lies for top dog status.

As discussed elsewhere: https://zclub.net/community/index.php?threads/super-samuri-collecting-cars-gaw-105m.32250/

So what was "Hmmmm" (five letters, since we are stickling...) intended to mean? I'm looking at it in the context of your previous comments, such as: In amongst all the negative comments about S30.World and their work on this thread, from where I'm sitting it looks like you're trying to hint at something without actually saying it. You want to have your cake and eat it, don't you? Always 'more on this later', but never actually committing to any tangible opinion. You tell us that you've had a working relationship with the owner of the company in question for "many years", and yet I've not seen you make a single post or comment in their support while all and sundry were posting uninformed nonsense about them here and dissing their work. Hmmmm indeed. I think I've got your number. On the other hand, you might well want to be careful about associating yourself with S30.World on here. After all, our friend SpeedRoo might call you a "so-called expert" and Zed Head will be asking you if payola is involved.

Delay is due to paperwork-related logistics issues. A lot of my own work involves international shipments, so I have some sympathy when I hear of paperwork going missing in transit. And as someone who mistook a movement docket for a 'Factory Build Sheet', I trust you'll have just as much sympathy for 'Lost In Transit' as 'Lost In Translation'...

Ha ha. This is the world of used car sales we are talking about here. You even presume that the seller knows everything about the car? That's your schtick. Own it. Don't make me laugh. Last week you were dissing the staff and work of S30.World on this thread for all you were worth - whilst demonstrating at the same time that you knew nothing about them ("just seling car parts") - and then when the boss and a few other well-respected 'consultants' show up and post here in reply you're suddenly the wide-mouthed frog adding 'likes' to their posts. How come you didn't ask a few of them whether they had "stock options", a "paying position" or are "on the board"? Anyone with any sense can see how you operate.

A buyer - or anyone else - might assume anything at all, right or wrong. But you're already on the head of that pin, positing that provenance is either important or unimportant, with no mention of the pragmatism required when dealing with 55 year old cars existing in the huge gap between those two positions. And if changing paint stickers 'removes provenance' then every car with a repro sticker - no matter if it has just the right amount of shine - is a demerit. ...and reductio ad absurdum. Ask zspert about his "alternates created of all the things that collectors usually inspect for originality". Originality is nice, but its not an infinite resource. It is necessary - for the continuation of our hobby - to repair and replace. There are industries dedicated to that end. There's not a car owned by the members of this site that would be an example of total originality. It is an impossibility and your theory is nonsense, even hypothetically.

I've got a hunch - just a feeling in my bones - that the paint is not 'Amino Alkyd Enamel' either. "False advertising"? Seriously? The repro paint sticker matches the re-paint and colour change. Do you think they should have used a sticker for the original green instead? Some of the nitpicking here is beyond parody. Not immune to the occasional malapropism, however.

But why do you expect to see detailed photos of a commercial, industrial process over and above the few PR photos that Nissan chose to show us? They gave us plenty of information about the product itself and a fair bit of information about the company and its various operations. As far as Nissan are concerned, anything more than that is really none of our business.

None that I'd break a promise and post here.

Nissan's L24 engines were put together in the same place as the S30 L20A engines, the aforementioned main Yokohama plant. They have a Nissan Engine Museum in one of the original 1930s buildings still standing, adjacent to the main plant in Takara Cho. Recommended for a visit. The point being you are asking for photos of the "240Z assembly line" but showing a photo a photo of a quite different location. Many of the component parts and sub-assemblies of 'our' cars were made in plants elsewhere, then put together at Nissan Shatai Koki's facility in Hiratsuka.

This is the engine fire-up test section of Nissan's main Yokohama plant and the engines shown are non-Z variants. It is not the Nissan Shatai plant at Hiratsuka, which put together the S30-series Zs.

...and the photo comes from the FIA 3022 fiche, which is for the S30 Fairlady Z-S and Z-L, so not on the "240Z assembly line". It was the S30-series Z assembly line.

As discussed in the thread where the photo was Hoovered from: https://www.classiczcars.com/forums/topic/68900-finally-found-a-69-240z-51-time-to-finish-a-30-year-multiple-owner-restoration/page/16/

Are you going to ask these same questions to anyone else now?

Hi Nils, A name on that Swiss dealer list jumped straight out at me. I believe Rudolf Seiler of Fischbach was the brother of Ernst 'Hunter' Seiler of Romanshorn, a well-known Porsche dealer and racing driver from the late 1940s through to the late 60s. I guess car sales concessions ran in the family. Sorry for the digression!

As somebody respected in his field, I'd hope that you might empathise with people who are attempting to restore cars as close as is reasonably possible to how they were when they were new and making them available to people who understand and appreciate that intention, whilst also understanding the implicit truth that it is simply not possible to attain perfection in terms of factory finish. That should go without saying, regardless of any over-enthusiastic sales patter written in their second language. Constructive, objective and informed peer-group critique is something that we can all continue to learn from and the classiczcars forum is a good place to do that. It is nice when wise old heads pass on their knowledge and experience. But S30.World appears to be the target of some 'Not From Round Here' type finger poking which I would hope looks just as parochial and small-minded to you as it does to me, and it would be refreshing to see an occasional positive comment with regard to the spirit, if not the product of their efforts.