Jump to content

IGNORED

Muffler suggestions


branham76

Recommended Posts

With my carb setup, I decided to use a 2 1/4" dia. custom-made Borla system. The 2 1/2" dia. muffler is identical in size to the 2 1/4". It fits well. You can see a few photos in the Members Gallery under Fixitman. A $100.00 for a muffler and tailpipe that will last over 10-15 years is a terrific deal. You just need to have the tailpipe welded on or one end flared.

If you are interested in a full S.S. system, I can put you in touch with MSA's supplier to have the pipes bent.

Fixitman

If you would like a quieter exhaust system, you could even add a Borla resonator.

I'm going to for 2-1/4" too, I hear it's gives you better mid-range power. 2-1/2" is good for racing and lots of high revs. That's what I hear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to for 2-1/4" too, I hear it's gives you better mid-range power. 2-1/2" is good for racing and lots of high revs. That's what I hear.

Nope, not true. IF the 2.25" is limiting you, the 2.5" will be better in ALL aspects. If the 2.25" is not limiting you, and it probably wouldn't on a stock-ish L24, then a 2.5" will not hurt nor help. It'll just take away some ground clearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Custom order from Fujitsubo Japan. There's 3 of us on here with the same exhaust, but we all run different headers.

I'd be very interested to hear what this sounds like.

I've never been able to determine what header/exhaust/muffler combination is on my '70, but I love the sound:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, not true. IF the 2.25" is limiting you, the 2.5" will be better in ALL aspects. If the 2.25" is not limiting you, and it probably wouldn't on a stock-ish L24, then a 2.5" will not hurt nor help. It'll just take away some ground clearance.

It's the old back pressure argument. The engineer in me says the less restriction the better. More mass flow, less friction losses from turbulence is better. But some says you need back pressure; these discussions go back decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the old back pressure argument. The engineer in me says the less restriction the better. More mass flow, less friction losses from turbulence is better. But some says you need back pressure; these discussions go back decades.

This has been discussed countless times. Those that wish to perpetuate the myth are ignorant of the facts. Discussions about the Earth being flat went on for quite a while, doesn't mean they were anywhere close to being right.

Hopefully, this thread can properly inform the "you-need-backpressure" crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has been discussed countless times. Those that wish to perpetuate the myth are ignorant of the facts. Discussions about the Earth being flat went on for quite a while, doesn't mean they were anywhere close to being right.

Hopefully, this thread can properly inform the "you-need-backpressure" crowd.

Thanks Leon, good stuff. When we were designing systems for fluid flow in college, no one ever suggested we increase friction or reduce flow rate to improve efficiency. That's why I've always been baffled by the talk of backpressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't want back pressure. You want momentum.

Problem is that sometimes an increase in momentum is accompanied by an increase in back pressure.

I'm no expert in the field, but my theory is that since an increase in momentum is often accompanied by an increase in back pressure, people started thinking that back pressure was the desired effect, and it's not. It's the unwanted, but often necessary, side effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.