Is it just me or are there other's out there who think the 2+2 has a better shape on certain angles than the 2 seaters?

It's just you

hehehe

Did you login under A diff. name & vote for the 2+2?

I just like the original 240z shape over the 2+2 shape and when I shop for Z car I would only buy regular 240Z over a 2+2

Who ever heard of a "Sports-Stationwagon?" Besides, only a contorsionist can fit in those back seats anyway.

I think that "at certain angles" the 2+2 looks pretty damn good. Although, I favor the design of the 2-seater early Z's, the 2+2 isn't that ugly. I mean, c'mon.... have you seen other cars on the road?

It's still a classic Z!! The ZX on the other hand... is just an ugly pig.

Here's an example of my 280z 2+2 at a decent angle.

Bigmac also has a pretty nice 260z 2+2. CLICK HERE to see his ride.

Hey guys If you wanna see my old 2+2 it's at the link below:

http://www.project240z.0catch.com/friendscars.htm

It's the white one there's also pictures of other cars below it.

I love Big Mac's 2+2 it's a pure animal.

This is a good angle:

ROFL

I have one of each, although the 2+2 is looking a little worse for wear after a recent intimate moment with a Ford Falcon. I have no problems with the 2+2 after all it is a zed and with the kids the age they are at least I don't have to be seen in the Camry too often!

I agree on some angles my 76 2+2 does look better then a 2 seater. Glad to see someone else thinks this. However I just picked up a 240 8 years after I bought my 2+2 and it is a real Zed. You can't beat them...:classic:

no offense to the stretched car lovers, but the way it was made originally always looks better