I happen to have a set of Grant rings waiting to go into my rebuild. Since Chickenman mentioned modern materials, I pulled out the instructions that came from Grant. Step 4 states: "Check piston ring end clearance. Check in cylinder near bottom of ring travel. Ring end clearance should be approximately 0.003" to 0.004" per inch of cylinder diameter." With our 83mm bores in the L24's, this works out to 0.249-0.332mm. Nominally, this is 0.29mm. Blue said the average gap would work out to 0.416mm or about 0.126mm too large on average. Since this is a circumferal measurement, it equates to a diameter that is 0.040mm undersized. Or conversely, it could be said the bore is 0.040mm (0.0015") oversize relative to the rings supplied. I think the operative word in the instructions was "approximately". The critical dimension is the low limit. Too low and the gap closes down to solid as the engine warms. When this happens, the rings dig into the cylinder wall with catastrophic results. Remember the allowable taper on the cylinder is 0.008" compared to the calculated 0.0015" oversize. Since Blue's cylinders had little to no taper, I would not think the excessive gap would be a problem. Of course, this comes from someone who hasn't rebuild an engine in over fifty years. If I'm full of it, please educate me.