Jump to content
We Need Your Help! ×

IGNORED

What is wrong with the 350Z?


hls30.com

What is wrong with the 350Z?  

128 members have voted

  1. 1. What is wrong with the 350Z?

    • 1) Nothing but nitpicky stuf!
    • 2) Too many accountants telling engineers/stylists what they can't do.
    • The wheels aren't right.
    • No forced induction version.
    • Too flashy interior
    • the interior is not flashy enough
      0
    • The car wasn't ment to be a part of the grocery getting lifestyle.
    • Too many gizmos.
    • Fit and finish leaves a little to be desired.
    • Nissan didn't build in some performance that the after market charges too much for.
    • OMG it IS ugly!
    • It is too beautiful to drive on the street
    • Looks too much like a frog to be taken seriously-until you get left...
    • it is a mismash of design-elements are used once instead of repeatedly.
    • Are you nutZ the car is da bomb!!


Recommended Posts

As an auto engineer, I drive a lot of different vehicles. We did a drive a while back with a C6 Corvette, CTS-V, older M5, 350Z, GTO, and Shelby GT500. This was the first time I had any real time in a 350Z and I really didn't have any idea what to expect. If anything, I thought it would feel heavy and bulky. Wow, was I surprised! The 350Z was by far the most nimble car of the group and felt WAY lighter and more connected to the road than any of the other cars. The C6 was a nice car, but felt cumbersome and big compared to the Z. Of the cars on the drive, the Z was by far the best driver's car and was the most playfull of the group. I always read on the Z sites about how the 350Z isn't a real Z and how it should have a ZX badge, etc. etc. IMHO, if those people would drive the Z and it's MODERN competitors back to back, they would change their minds about the Z. Modern cars are not and will never be 240Z's!!! The amount of saferty, emissions, and creature comforts that buyers demand, add huge amounts of weight to even the best designs. The C6 Z06 is the only car I can think of that defies the trend. Yes, the 350Z is the same as the G35, M, and FX vehicles, but that's what it took to bring Nissan out of the red and re-establish themselves. I think they did a hell of a job.

The biggest problem I have with the 350Z is the ricer image it's getting. There is no way to predict or prevent this though, so we'll just have to co-exist with the new Z crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The MGB was introduced in the Fall of 1962 as a '63 model. Nissan was making Roadsters that early?

Yea. I know this is a different thread - in a different forum - but Will is right. It's close enough to call it a draw, but Datsun debut it's sports months before the MGB.

Besides, other than both being a convertible sports car, the two are really different beasts from very different design roots. Much like the other generalizations made, Nissan did it's own work, despite the many claims of adaptation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I can agree with all you and Arne just said, the one real argument there is how much less it costs to put an S2000 in the same arena-much less ahead in the same race! Honda support and sponsorship is sooo much more available than the Nissan counterparts.

I'm not sure where this is coming from, Nissan Motorsports offers pretty good contingencies and parts discounts (up to "free") for registered racers. The dollars are comparable to what Honda offers based on my discussions with Bob Endicott. Regarding race prep costs, having done race prep on two Honda S2Ks I also am at a loss as to why its supposedly cheaper then the 350Z to build into a race car. Both require full cages, both require expensive shocks, both require big wheels and tires, both require oiling system upgrades, both require racing clutches, both require fuel cells, both require racing seats, etc. Where are the dollar savings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to that John I don't see the S2000 that competitive in SCCA T2 or GA Cup. The 350Z competes with and beats much more costly cars. The S2000 is very good at AutoX. It is more difficult to drive fast. I have owned both and the 350Z is much more stable. The car is reminds me of my E36 M3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His biggest complaint was that Nissan was more than happy to sponsor golf, Bicycle events, and marathons, but didn't want to help out in a sport in which their porduct was used...With NO connecttion to Honda other than ownersip of a car, he had parts and expertise tossed his way form all over...

I'll get with him over the weekend for more info, but if an award winning (My parts purchases at work haha!) Parts Manager at a well and long established Nissan Dealership has troubles...

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a love-hate relationship with my 350Z. The recalls are becoming annoying (tires, fuel filler hose) and then the first time I went to manually unlock the door from inside the cable snapped requiring yet anothe rvisit to the dealer. The transmission mainshaft bearing noise is not pleasant either especially when it has been noisy since 8k miles. I have mine parked in the garage in Florida at 26k miles and it gets driven last when I visit the other stable mates: '82 280ZX, '81 280ZX, '91 Mustang GT.

It is a competent vehicle and on long trips returns surprising gas mileage. On one trip to Pensacola, Fl. from Maryland it pulled 535 miles out of one tank of gas which averaged out to 31-32mpg. It is alot of fun to drive and that is probably its best feature.

The styling is not the most inspired as I completed the Nissan survey back in '98 or '99 I mentioned that the new car should emulate the E-type, 2000GT, and 275GTB. I also mentioned that they should dust off the tooling and simply remake more S30 bodyshells.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate to weigh in on a thread that's stated title is to find fault with something. I'll make some personal observations anyway.

1. When the G35 came out I thought it was strikingly beautiful. When we did the 350Z I thought it was too controversial, too strong of a design statement. After the first year I changed my mind. The G35 now is still beautiful but not in a lasting way. It's starting to fade. The 350 Is now my preference. It has shown more staying power and isn't fading into the background. It's going to be remembered by me and others as a good, strong and important design.

I still don't like the refrigerator door handle but that's just me. Nissan hit a home run just when they needed one.

2.When you try to talk about the 240 and the 350 as though they need to compete with one another you're comparing oranges to apples. It was two different times and two different circumstances. I believe that they were both successful relative to what they needed to do under the circumstances that existed.

Larry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 229 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.