Everything posted by kmack
-
engine diagnosis advice
Unfortunately, this description is only somewhat useful, but mostly vague for an accurate diagnosis. Is the noise up high in the engine or is it coming from down low? Does it vary with engine speed? How is it under load or while driving? Is it a tap, or a knock? (there is a difference) First off, there is not much diagnosis that can be done by just pulling the oil pan off the engine while in the car. This procedure is used mainly for when you want to replace the oil pan gasket only! You might be able to visually see if your main bearings have spun, but if you have that kind of noise coming from the engine, you WILL be pulling it! As for the sound, easy/quick diagnosis says that the valves need to be tightened. When the gap between the cam lobes and rocker arms becomes too much, you can get a very noticable tapping sound and it comes directly from underneath the valve cover. Get your service manual, Haynes manual, or what-have-you and get the gap set to the right dimension. That may cure it. In one instance, I have had the fuel pump arm off the mechanical fuel pump make a bit of a tapping sound. It was an aftermarket fuel pump on my old '73 motor and the arm would not make complete contact with the drive lobe off the cam. Another fuel pump cured the problem. If the sound is a deep sounding knock coming from low in the engine, then we're talking about a bit more serious problem. That usually means that the lower bearings are "loose" and the piston rod is knocking around during power cycles. Time for a major overhaul then. But this usually doesn't happen to the L series motors until close to 300K miles unless they have been seriously abused. Try the valve adjustment first and see if that helps/cures the problem. If not, then see if you can locate from where the noise is coming from. If you can't pinpoint it, get a long piece of small diamter tubing to use a stethescope or you can use the old-timer screwdriver-in-the-ear trick, but that one never worked for me.
-
Your opinion on this front air dam (sweet)
I like this particular one better: http://www.zcarparts.com/store/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=50-1409&Category_Code=7AD1 It still has the "thick" style bumper look, but it sits closer to the car, more flush look. It doesn't protrude out from the front of the car as much, so it's less noticable.
-
Front End Rebuff
These are kind of hard to see since they are painted black, but I think this is what you are talking about. http://www.classiczcars.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=1261&password=&sort=7&thecat=3029 Basically, he had a bent bumper, cut the center section out, welded caps on the ends of the corners, and re-mounted them. Turned out nice looking. Sorry I don't have a better picture. Or You could do something like this. http://www.classiczcars.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=1262&password=&sort=7&thecat=3029 Here the guy took a flat aluminum bar, shaped it, and mounted it just like you're talking about. He also has a matching single flat piece across the back. This link has some good photos: http://www.z-sport.com/telmspics.html
-
Your opinion on this front air dam (sweet)
I think it would look better if the "bumper section" was thinner, like the original 240 bumpers. The way it is just looks too fat. Other than that, I think it looks good.
-
Cutting spring coil
That's kind of what I was thinking but wasn't sure. I have a full-height standing drill press so I can make it work. And I don't expect my springs to be anything even close to 300 lb springs anyway.
-
Cutting spring coil
Just out of curiosity, how could you measure a spring rate at home?
-
Big Sam
My engine info has been documented in the following thread: http://www.classiczcars.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10733&highlight=dyno But here's a quick run-down: Original L24 block (1971) stock bore stock pistons new rings new seals new gaskets FelPro head gasket E31 head (unmodified) stock cam stock oil pump 6-2-1 headers into a 2-1/4" exhaust with turbo muffler '71 SU's w/ K&N filter in stock airbox stock needles and nozzles (currently sure what number needles are in there, but they are the ones that came with the car when I got it.) With the airbox in place, I pulled 136 hp at the wheels. I pulled 139.2 hp at the wheels with the airbox removed. And I was still running rich. Estimated compression is 9.5:1
-
Cutting spring coil
2Many, I don't want to cut the coils if I don't have to. I'm just looking for pros and cons for this option. 1. Yes I already have adjustable bushings in the control arms, but you may remember that the initial reason I got them was to overcome the too much positive camber on the left front suspension. I have since slotted the strut tower on the left front to help make the bushings more effective for camber adjustment. 2. The MSA camber plates seem to be my best bet, but as always, they cost more money than I have. Cutting the springs effectively costs me nothing more than my time. It's the side effects that I'm trying to determine right now and if I want to deal with them. 3. Either way I want to lower the car some. Any other options on doing this other than: a) relocating/sectioning the strut tubes buying lowering springs (already have the money issue) c) buying larger rims to help fill in the space (again money issue) 4. If I could at least get to -2.5* of camber that would be great! But like I said, with bushings, and a slotted tower, I can only get -1* out of the left front. The right front will go farther, but there's no point if the left can't follow. I'd like to pursue greyghost's idea about the 710 control arms, if anybody has any more info. My other option (that I honestly haven't looked at much) is to lengthen my left control arm. I have already lengthened the left T/C rod to get my caster where it needs to be. That has worked out good so far. Or I could relocate the control arm holes in the cross member, but by how much? What dimension of movement of the holes gives what change of camber in degrees?
-
Cutting spring coil
greyghost, Interesting idea here. Although I haven't seen many 710's around the junkyards lately. Any idea how much longer the control arms were in relation to Z control arms? Were the 710 control arms used on any other models?
-
Carbs
Well....I never said anything about "dumb" questions....
-
Cutting spring coil
What's the consensus on cutting a coil or two off the strut springs? I'm looking to lower the car some and add a little negative camber also. I have a set of performance springs that work pretty good on the track, but I can't get any more camber adjustment. (I need to get a little more for running high-speed events). I realize cutting the spring will lower the car some, not a bad thing, though. How will this affect the spring rate? Will it increase it some or at all? At this point, I don't have the budget for coil-overs, and standard camber plates are designed to be used with coil-overs. I know MSA has a set of camber plates to be used with stock struts, but I'm afraid that these add to the overall strut height some and won't give me the added negative camber I'm looking for. FWIW, I already have about 1-1/2* of negative camber. I'm looking for up to -3*. Any thoughts? Good or bad? I'm just in the idea stage right now.
-
Carbs
Gee, thanks a lot Chris.....seeing that picture sent shivers down my back as I remembered rebuilding those damned boat-anchors so many years ago! :tapemouth :tapemouth :sick: :tapemouth To think, I actually had them working pretty good. Live and learn
-
Carbs
The 260's originally came with flat tops. Here is a picture of the roundtops on my car: http://www.geocities.com/vintagericeracing/159.html Round-tops have the float bowls attached to the lower side of the main carb body. The flat-tops, have the float bowls integrated into the bottom of the carb body. Plus they are much bigger than the round-tops. And we all had to learn about these things at one point or another. Hell, I didn't know the difference in carbs until after I already had the flat-tops running on my old spare motor from a junk '73!! Talk about a waste of time!:tapemouth :stupid: No one here will criticize you for asking questions. That's how you learn. Before you know it, you'll be the one answering someone else's questions. We've all been there.
-
Carbs
Engine ID number should start with: L24, L26 or L28 If you do have the "round-top" carbs on the engine, you're headed in the right direction. Round-top meaning that the transition from the horizontal top surface of the carb dome to the vertical side surface has a radius to it, not a sharp edge. For those reading that may not know.
-
Big Sam
And.....? Please continue this topic. I have an L28 waiting in the wings to become my 200hp engine, but if I can get it from the L24, then all the better. As it stands, I'm already pushing 139hp at the wheels with my original L24 w/ E31 head. That puts my crank output somewhere in the neighborhood of around 165 hp! How do I get more?
-
What's the theory behind carb linkage adj.?
Here's my guess: Keep in mind this is subject to misinterpretation and my inability to put forth in words exactly what my brain thinks...:stupid: It looks like the adjust is there for one of two reasons (or both). 1) My first thought would be that placing the carb linkage in the farthest hole on the arm away from the manifold would give a slower throttle response. That in turn, would make it easier to make minor adjustments to throttle position using the gas pedal while driving. Basically, better throttle control. Putting the carb linkage in the hole in the arm closest to the manifold would give you quicker throttle response due to having a shorter distance to travel while opening the throttle butter-flys. Kind of a course vs. fine adjustment type of control. 2) My other thought would be to maybe help overcome some of the same type syptoms in the bell-crank set-up as with the stock Z throttle linkage issues at the firewall. But I think my 1st opinion above is a better reason. So tell me, did any of this make any sense at all? I know in my mind it did....
-
I was wondering.
Almost 99.9% of my time while logged in, is from work. Strange as it seems, I tend to have much more free time at work than I do at home. Although I haven't been logged in as much lately as in previous years (new job in the last year), I still get on fairly regularly. I just have too many projects at home to tend to, and the computer at home is WAY to slow!!
-
Forgive me father for I have sinned.
I'll also agree with everyone here and say paint it what you wish. My personal opinion, though, is this: The early Z's are one of the few cars that can pull off a yellow paint job and still look great!! Not even Corvettes look as good in yellow as a Z! Something about the body... My '71 is Nissan 905 Red (like a Cherry Red). I went back to the original color for a variety of reasons. The PO had repainted the car similar to Will's, it was painted Porsche Guard's Red (slightly darker) when I got it. The paint was bad and had to be completely stripped off the car. Now this left me open to paint what ever color I wanted. And I REALLY wanted it to be black! But, I'm also a bit of a perfectionist at heart. And to change the color in my book, meant changing the color inside and out. Exterior and interior, floor and door jambs, everything. That ended up to be much more work than I wanted to do, not to mention more paint. I then found out that the 905 Red was much brighter, so I went for it. That color, on top of a very light-colored primer, absolutely glows in the sun! So much that on a bright, sunny day, you cannot stare at the car unless you're wearing sunglasses!! So my recomendation? Paint it what you like. But keep in mind, that if you change the color, and don't change it completely, you will, at some point, still be able to see the yellow later on. The choice you make ultimately depends on what you want to do with the car and what you want the car to be for you. BTW - Nissan Sunset Orange (350Z) looks great on the early body Z's!!!
-
mazda rx-7 fuel pump
This was also discussed a few years back, but I think on the email list... Some Ford cars and trucks run an impact cut-off switch. Particularly, Ford Escorts and Ranger pick ups, are the ones I know for sure. If the vehicle was ever in an accident, the impact would trigger the switch closed and cut power to the fuel pump. The fuel pump would not get power until the reset button on the switch was pushed. Escorts had the switch located in the rear usually behind the rear quarter interior panels (Left side I believe). The Ranger pick ups had them mounted under the dash (center) right about where the carpet terminated at the bottom of the dash board. Simple to install really, you just wire it in before the fuel pump and place it in a place where it can be accessed if you ever hit anything. Which hopefully, will never happen. As for the oil pressure switch, I can see one benefit. If you ever lose oil pressure while driving, either because you burned all the oil up and never checked it or the oil change service place forgot to put the drain plug in tight, then theorectically, the engine will die and keep you from going any further without oil.
-
I'm not getting fuel to the carbs
I love it when I diagnose something correctly! :classic: Mark, glad you got it figured out and that your car is now running. Now finish tuning the carbs and the motor and go for a well deserved drive!
-
finally on th road but plugs fouling quickly
Yes, double check your timing, inspect your plug wires, and points. Make sure everything is up to snuff. Process of elimination....
-
I'm not getting fuel to the carbs
SU's don't use an accelerator pump.
- Ouch
-
Ouch
Oh, and did I mention that I have a "depression" (read: BIG missing chunk of skin) on my left forearm? After I got done painting my car, I had lots of overspray on the floor. Found out that a sanding pad on my 4-1/2" grinder took the paint off the concrete really nicely. Well, with grinder in my right hand, I used my left hand to "flip" the power cord out of my way. I flipped it over and across my right hand. (See where this is going?) :stupid: Needless to say, skin will not stop a fast spinning grinder, but it tries.... :tapemouth :tapemouth Now my wife pulls out my arm to show others and says, "This is what happens when you spill paint in my garage!"
-
I'm not getting fuel to the carbs
Was this car running before you rebuilt the carbs or was it sitting? Were you getting fuel before? Got to check it out step by step. Use a separate gas can like you were using (2.5 gal will work just fine). Start at the fuel pump and go fromt here. Check each and every item between the pump and the carbs. You'll eventually find the blockage through process of elimination. Good luck and let know how it turns out.