Zed Head

Browsing on Motor Sport Auto and saw that they have relabeled their red links to the proper brown, and it looks like they have also derated them to the proper amperage. Yay! Old Z wiring is safer now. https://www.thezstore.com/page/TZS/PROD/12-4329 https://www.thezstore.com/page/TZS/PROD/12-4336

I noticed that your link was messed up in one of your earlier pictures. Somebody lost the other piece the end that connects to the battery, with the plastic clip and the eyelet. Looks like they just pulled the end out and clamped it down. It will be longer and more correct with the proper pieces. Looks like they're hard to find though. Here's a picture from BAT showing what should be there. The link is between the two red marks.

And this one about GL$/GL5 oils.

This one is pretty good too. Synchros.

https://www.amazon.com/Bussmann-BP-CB211-15-RP-Circuit-Breaker/dp/B009WQPC06/ref=sr_1_9?dchild=1&keywords=mini+fuse+circuit+breaker&qid=1634236907&sr=8-9

Came across this guy's youtube channel and he seems to know his stuff. There are other good videos but here's a general one that might be worth watching.

Different manufacturers making the same design. There have been a few discussions about the differences but it seems that any ECU from 75 to through 78 will work on any EFI engine. I tried the range, except 77, on my 76 and they all worked. The 78 ECU did crap out on me after a short drive, but I think that's why the car was being parted out. The one thing that won't work without the proper ECU is the altitude fuel adjustment. Here's another ECU link.

The short one looks familiar. 280Z. Looks in decent shape, hang on to it. They get crunched by curbs and shrubs and floor jacks. Part #10. http://www.carpartsmanual.com/datsun/Z-1969-1978/body-260z-280z/2-seater/radiator-grille-bumper/from-aug-76

470 HP, wide tires, and an R180. I think it's a show car, not a go car. "Powered by a 400 cu in 470 hp Blueprint built small block Chevy"

Might be shown un one of the 71 240Z diagrams. Use your meter on that forked black wire and see if it's a ground wire. https://www.classiczcars.com/files/category/1-wiring-diagrams/

Check your camshaft and rocker arms. Could also be timing chain or sprocket.

Actually he did have an Austin Healey before he had a family. Positive ground? But he had plenty of good old America iron after that and did all his own maintenance. I think he was creating a "teaching" moment.

That's not obvious!

That might be confusing. There's a forked lug on the condenser case too. The case of the condenser goes to ground. The guts get the positive. My first experience with positive and negative was when I was installing a radio in my car. It came with a condenser and I asked my father how it was supposed to be connected. He is an electronics engineer. He told me to connect the case to positive and the free wire to ground (pretty pretty pretty sure that's what he said). It blew the guts out in my face like a firecracker. Ha ha ha hah. Had to go all the way to Radio Shack to get a new one. This thought crossed my mind. Positive terminals/wires should never ever be connected to the case of anything. Cases and covers and housings are always ground.

There's a forest of burning smoking wires out there. Scary.

Wise words above. Mayolives has learned a tough lesson.

They worked! Yay. The melting (fusing) process can be incomplete. Even a single strand of wire remaining will show continuity so that not a good sign of viability for future use. Check the fusible link for the EFI system also. It's connected to the positive post at the battery. 78 used two greens side-by-side, exposed. Also make sure that you didn't get the EFI wires switched. They used the same type of connectors for negative and positive. (Genius!). Hopefully you didn't fry the ECU. All of the things you touched have the possibility of reversed positive and ground. Even at the starter. These old Z's are well known for using red and black indiscriminately on the big cables, for some odd reason.

Your points are all good ones. The pulling of air through the seal would depend on the balance between the rate of pull (the spring force of the spring behind the piston) and the viscosity and availability of the fluid through the tube from the reservoir. And the tightness of the seal on the piston. So, lots of other variables besides luck. But it's something to be aware of. I think that the same things apply to vacuum versus pressure for brakes. If you pump your vacuum chamber way down to close to true vacuum you're more likely to suck air past the seal I'd guess. And, applying all of this to the "corner" theory, you can see that a slow fluid flow to avoid sucking air could lead to leaving corner bubbles behind. In sum, considering all, for me, a shovel handle against the seat back remains my preferred method.

Oops. I had the wrong year. Like yarb said, the cars with external regulators used a single prong oil pressure sensor. Round. You can put a flat terminal on that wire and just use the sensor terminal on yours. The other terminal is a switch. Don't know on the other wire.

The picture reminds me of another way to bleed cylinders - work the system in reverse, from the end. I did that on the clutch slave cylinder. You can open the bleed screw and push the piston backward with finger pressure. That drives the fluid out of the bleed hole, then when you close the bleed screw, it pulls new fluid in from the reservoir. You can also unbolt the cylinder so that it has the screw hole oriented upward. This is in the same vein as pressure versus vacuum versus mechanical.

This is the main problem with bleeding brakes. cgsheen1's pictures show that it could still be a concern. The "calipers on the wrong side" issue is an example of a large "corner" in the flow path of the fluid. The rear wheel cylinder picture shows a small corner. Really you're talking about dead zones that don't get swept by the fluid and are higher than the flow path of the fluid as it moves to the bleed port. That's where the bubbles go. Be the bubble. If you had cgsheen1"s cylinders you might want to lift the side your bleeding waaay up in the air before starting.

They are. But that's probably a very early 240Z shaft used on the cars with the forward-set differentials. Those used a shorter propeller shaft. People use them with the 71C transmission conversion, but they're too short for a stock 280Z coupe with a 71B transmission. Edit - actually I think that it would work but you'd lose that inch of engagement with the transmission. I think it might be closer to 1 1/2" if I recall right.

Maybe that's a reason people have problems bleeding Z brakes. You can imagine a pressure or vacuum bleeder that's moving fluid slowly leaving some air behind. I put speed bleeders on the back mainly because I wanted to purge the lines of old fluid easily but it might have helped me avoid some problems also. And, are those aftermarket cylinders? Might not be representative of Nissan. But, it does show angled drilling, maybe they just didn't get the angle right. Might be some guy on an assembly line eyeballing it. Thanks for the informative pictures.