Are you trying to imply that SUs are able to optimally feed each cylinder? The manifold design for SUs has been proven to be flawed in terms of mixture distribution to each cylinder with WB02 data-logging. The AFR between cylinders is not consistent, and there are some nice bends in there as well adding more pumping losses. On the other hand, a triple setup gives each cylinder its own venturi. Bends in the intake tract are minimized and the mixture cylinder-to-cylinder is more or less consistent. It is also possible to do effective intake resonance tuning with this setup by simply switching out bell-mouths. Yes, SUs work well and are great for someone looking for street driving and decent performance. However, when it comes down to tuning and maximization of power (or efficiency), the Webers have a profound advantage. Yetterben brought up a good point in that the EP racers need to keep the stock carbs. You think that if carb choice were unlimited that SUs would be preferred over Webers? I think not. As for the OP, if you don't know a lot about cars don't even think about triples, unless your wallet feels too heavy.