just because he's a chemist/scientist doesn't mean he has to give a 100 page disertation in his reponceses. I'm a mechanic, but that doesn't mean i have to go into deep detail about each thing.

Anyways, don't you think he started quoting formulas and $^!# you would get confused and have no idea what the hell he's saying?

just because he's a chemist/scientist doesn't mean he has to give a 100 page disertation in his reponceses. I'm a mechanic, but that doesn't mean i have to go into deep detail about each thing.

Anyways, don't you think he started quoting formulas and $^!# you would get confused and have no idea what the hell he's saying?

You obviously haven't read enough of Tom's previous questions, answers, and suggestions, otherwise you'd understand the reason for the comment(s).

sorry, but i'm not for bashing people on this thread. That's why I stood up for him- he's always been nice to me.

Sorry C.W. that just means that your response was not an informed one.

Hitler was nice (to some people, so was Clinton, Arafat, and so is Bush. I rest my case.

Ok, I understand the Bush statement, but Clinton?? Clinton makes Bush look like a fundamental capitolism fashist.

You obviously haven't read enough of Tom's previous questions, answers, and suggestions, otherwise you'd understand the reason for the comment(s).

CW-

That's Carl's way of saying that instead of siscussing something to a common understanding, they just take a shortcut and call you and/or your comment stupid. I think he just suggested you are stupid for not already knowing the answer as he (thinks) he does.

CW-