Zed Head

It won't disrupt anything, it's a straight bolt-in swap. But it might not make a difference. What are the problems with the starter you have?

An alternative is that this is your second car, for fun and a hobby. Buy it, race it around, get some tickets, slide it in to a ditch or two on those icy MN roads, fix it and modify it in the winter and do it again in the summer time. Just a thought. The car isn't really very practical as it sits, especially since you don't know a ton about cars, but it looks like some fun. Someone planning to put all of those race parts on a stock car might easily spend over $5,000. The coil over work and brakes are easily over $3,000, just looking at comparable internet prices. If you were planning to go that route, this might be a deal, if not, they're just wasted parts.

Go racing?

Assume that the engine is worthless and see what the rest looks like. No rust, paint looks good, seats in decent shape, 5 speed, coil-overs, decent dash. Looks like some standard L24 performance mods on the engine. But it could be worn out by now. Find out when it last drove so you'll have an idea of whether or not the various hydraulic parts will need replacing. Over 2 years in MN and the fluids will probably have absorbed moisture. Might need new calipers, master cylinders and slave cylinder. Also find out what "needs some work". The $25,000 number is irrelevant, only the $5,000 number matters.

Z train is right, I was off target on the pilot bushing. The crankshaft, pilot bushing and input shaft are all spinning at the same speed when the clutch is engaged, so it wouldn't make a noise while you're cruising. Examine the the things that all spin at the same speed as the crankshaft or come in to contact with it and you might come up with something. Maybe your throwout bearing is touching the springs. Z train, did you mean input shaft? Isn't the output shaft spinning at a speed proportional to road speed, independent of RPM?

Doesn't seem like a common noise. Has the car been sitting or driven regularly? Is it always 2800 RPM, no matter what gear or just 2800 RPM in a certain gear? Have you checked the fluid level in the transmission? Could be the pilot bushing.

You could put a small rheostat in line somewhere and adjust it up until you get desired performance. Or get a few resistors and do trial and error to see what you need. That way you can just go for it and make it work, but still be safe on the wiring. Plus, the heater circuit might already have a fuse in-line, or you could/should add one.

It's inside the alternator case.

I think that the spherical shape of the stock "washers" is designed to take up any thickness differences and equalize the load between the intake and exhaust manifold flanges. A flat surfaced shoulder bolt will only put pressure on the highest surface, plus it will put a bending load on the bolt if there is a thickness mismatch. Might work if both flanges at every location are of the same thickness.

Piling on: If you use the RT-style mount with the Energy Suspension GM transmission mount, suspension work is super-easy. The differential will hang from the mount instead of sitting on the cross member. You can remove the Nissan front diff mount entirely. No need to support the diff to change bushing or stuts or springs. Just one more benefit. I noticed when I was working on the clunk problem also, that if you strap the diff down too tight it can be drawn down on to the cross member, generating more diff whine and vibration in the cabin. In my case, the mount was so worn that it wasn't really holding the diff nose from moving up or down.

yoshi, you didn't say if your ZX is a manual or automatic transmission. If it's a manual, and you have a fuel supply problem, it wouldn't be so RPM specific. Try changing gears and see if the problem is speed or RPM related. You mentioned a new throttle body. Why did you change the stock one? Did you go for a larger TB for "more power"? Upgraded FPR? If you're running the stock ECU, what features of a different FPR would be an upgrade? Seems like there might be more to your story. Have you been upgrading for performance, or is this a stock 1980 280ZX? Ted, you didn't really say what the solution to your problem was. Did you have EFI on your 240Z?

Didn't mean to be a downer. The topic comes up often and generates lots of discussion. Here's an interesting thread, in a similar vein, with lots of good insight - http://forums.hybridz.org/index.php/topic/102085-200-whp-na-build/ The short stroke of the L24 crank lowers your displacement also. The calculator shows 2.569 L. From what I've read, the lightened flywheel alone will make it feel "revvier", and some moderate flow work on the head will actually make it more rev happy. My limited knowledge...

Another clue would be to remove the water pump/alt belt next time it's making noise, then start the engine and listen. You'll just run off battery power and the engine won't overheat in the time it takes to see if the noise is still there or not.

According to this calculator (which seems to be pretty accurate) your piston will protrude out of the bore by 7.1 mm. http://www.ozdat.com/ozdatonline/enginedesign/ RB26DETT pistons look close but will give you an 11.25 CR.

Probably depends on if the corrosion is on the piston seal surface or not. I had a tiny little scratch in the bore of one of my calipers from the PO's rebuild (I think he dragged the dust cover holder wire across the surface) and the brakes worked fine but the caliper leaked fluid. Fully rebuilt calipers are surprisingly cheap. I think I got one for about $30 at OReilly auto a year and a half back.

Check the restriction in the block for blockage. Maybe you have low flow/pressure to the head.

I've seen it discussed over at Hybridz. The main concern is whether or not there's enough flow through the orifice in the block to get equal oil supply to all of the holes. I guess you could get an imbalance, although it doesn't seem likely. Some say there's plenty, others drill out the restriction in the block to be sure. You might search around over there to get a better idea. Why is the cam shaft being replaced? `

In #6 you said the bar was still plugged. Can you dig out what ever is in there? Might be informative. The holes on an internally oiled cam shaft are just as likely to get plugged, I believe. Pretty sure I read an account on another forum about a plugged internally oiled cam shaft causing some destruction.

Have you actually seen the holes in the cam shaft at each lobe's base circle, or are you assuming from the service manual. A picture would be interesting.

That's a very good point. One could probably estimate a likely range of location on a single cylinder's compression stroke and get a fair idea of where the other five would end up. #1 location - 120, - 120 more, - 120 more, etc. Or you could just eyeball the cam shaft, after multiple shutoffs and see where the lobes end up. That might be enlightening. We're not trying to tear down the concept, just doing some process development, to help people avoid some pitfalls. Plus it's just a good reason to BS about cams and what they do, and practice reading cam cards (which can be confusing - to me).

Leon, you've corrected a statement I made in a different thread. I said 4% of the time (30 of 720 degrees) there was overlap, according to the cam specs. in the FSM, but I neglected the other 5 cylinders. 6 x 4% = 24%. Actually 6 x 4.2 = 25%. 25% is pretty good odds that there will be some leakage through the intake manifold to the exhaust. Of course, this assumes correct valve lash settings. Looser lash would reduce the odds. You should also consider blow-by past the rings and valve seals. Still a test worth doing if you're stuck.

There is something not quite right about the "solution" in Post #10. The thermotime sensor only controls the cold start valve, which is only powered when the key is at Start. So the thermotime sensor should have nothing to do with your backfiring problem. "Off-idle" leanness could be caused by the TPS not indicating "idle" to the ECU. According to the FSM, Engine Fuel section, there is an "after idle" enrichment. It appears this is added by the ECU when the TPS switch moves from idle to the middle or part-throttle position. The diagram is on Page EF-11.

If you get a filter with 1/2" barbs, everything would work correctly, right? The inlet on your fuel pump is probably 12 mm or 1/2" (depending on the pump). Have you compared the fuel pump inlet size to the fuel tank outlet? 1/2" from the tank (actually 12 mm probably), 1/2" to and from the filter, 1/2" inlet on the fuel pump. The outlet from the tank is the big one and the return line from the engine bay is the small one (5/16" or 8 mm).

This guy got 192 hp with carbs and fairly mild components. The results are shown in Post #41. http://forums.hybridz.org/index.php/topic/100267-green-machine-gets-a-new-motor/page__st__40

Nothing in your picture looks obviously like a "vent hose". To me anyway. If you mean the vent line from the gas tank to the charcoal canister, that line needs to be open.