pro240c

well, then maybe twin 2in SUs would work better on a 202?

i think alan's hit the nail on the head there... and i think the reason it works on other engines is due to the different firing orders. i understand exactly now. thanks for volunteering that info. but one thing i don't understand is how a cam can change the firing order of an engine...?!?!?! the firing order is pre-determined by the way the crankshaft swings , not by how long/ when the valves open and close. you would not only need to custom make a crankshaft, but get a dizzy to suit and a whole new camshaft to change the valve timing. then make it run harmoniously.

i SO want that car... damn 1UZFE...it's cost me 3 cars now. :mad:

hey guys thanks for the replies. i'm still getting used to this forum type so it's a bit of a mission getting info at the moment - but time will help i spose. i don't have any pics of my 240C - YET. it's copping a 1UZFE (sacrelige they say! burn him!) and i'm halfway thru my rack and pinion conversion to make it fit. they're all 35mm pics, so i'll have to scan them and post them up for you all. i cetainly don't see how triple webers can be great and triple SUs can't. so yeah, i think it is better :classic: plus the induction roar would be great!

hi all. i was just wondering why there was never a triple SU manifold cast for the L series...? i mean, you would think with the great results an L fourpot gets out of twin SUs, surely 2 more cylinders would equal one more SU...? it just bugs the hell outta me that holden get one for their tractor engines (161ci right thru to 202ci) and yet the almighty L series gets stuck with 2 just because that was the only manufacturer's option. i'm sorry, i just don't see the logic in it. alternatively, anyone out there making or know of a kit that uses triple SUs...?