jonbill

Fwiw, I always lift mine with ratchet straps round the engine rather than chains. I've got very limited height in my garage so I need to get the leveller as close to the engine as possible.

Where do you even get 99 Ali? Mine is happy with 95.

Thanks. It's very far from perfect but it gets a bit better most years.

That'll be you then Ali [emoji28]

I swapped to an s13 fs5w71c gearbox about 3 years ago, just because it came up cheap and I fancied learning how to rebuild one. I'm using the original 3.7 r200 but put a Quaife in last year, which shaved about 0.3 seconds off. I think next on the wishlist is the AZC or TTT drop links & dog bone kit for the rear suspension mounts. I think I have some movement back there on hard starts. And I do have a finned diff rear cover I'm looking for an excuse to use.

Thanks. I'm sure I'll post quite regularly now I've said hello.

I don't actually know - it was on the car when I got it. Its certainly low, I have to repair it most years. It's also very big, but painting it black made it stand out less which I like.

No, 1/4 mile [emoji4]. Its an L28 taken out to 2.9 with a modified P90 head and a big cam. Triple Dellorto carbs, zstory race exhaust. Its been about 3 years of fettling but it runs nicely on the road and the track now. The engine bay has a lived in look.

Hi Mark, best time is 12.97 @ about 106 mph. I'm sure there's better to come, I'm only just getting the hang of a decent start.

Hello, I've been reading the forum for a long time and I'm overdue introducing myself. I'm Jon, I'm in the UK and have had my 260z since 2002. For the most part I've been keeping it in good standard shape but for the last few years I've been in a bit of a performance improving cycle prompted by a bit of drag racing. Hopefully I can stop soon. [emoji102] Here's a pic of it.

I have a 20 year old mr2 with 3 sensors and 20 year old modern engine management electronics. The first sensor measures the output of cylinders 1 & 4, the second measures the output of cylinders 2 & 3 and the last measures the aggregate after the catalytic converter to judge whether the cat is working or not. I believe this is representative of multisensor setups. Each sensor is trusted to measure its bit independently. Sensors of course do fail. The management system strategy for this is to constantly cycle mixture up and down a bit to check if the sensor reports it. If it doesn't it reports a fault. There's no reason to not believe a single sensor and controller and gauge will report reasonably accurately the average AFR of the combustion chambers it's monitoring.

Thanks. Funnily enough, it doesn't - it mainly depends on the chemistry of the fuel and air mixture which hasn't changed for a very long time. I'm sure there are conditions in which the accuracy is compromised significantly, but it's not within the normal degradation of an engine say in the first few 100k miles of it's life. That's why many of the spark ignition cars of the last 20 odd years are still on the road passing their emissions tests using this technology to regulate their fueling.

In theory, what you do exactly is measure the voltage generated by the sensor, look it up in a table to find the experimentally determined and theoreticaly backed o2 concentration that corresponds to and then look that up in another table to find what the AFR would have been in the chamber to result in that residual o2 concentration in the exhaust. That o2 concentration to AFR table is also experimentally determined and theoretically backed. The experiments show that, consistently enough, for a given AFR in the chamber, o2 concentration in the exhaust will be constant regardless of other variables. For a narrow band sensor, its responses are only trustworthy in a narrow range either side of lambda=1 or stoichiometric AFR. Outside that it can only tell you lean or rich. A wideband sensor is accurate in a wider band of AF ratios, around 10:1 to 20:1. An odd first post I know.