Jump to content
Remove Ads
Welcome Guest! Please read more information about our club!

Carl Beck

Free Member

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by Carl Beck

    I'm not finding an E1031…In the Nissan Motorsports Catalogs I see:

    99996-E1032 L9 SALOM Camshaft  490 lift and 290 degrees - 

    Reground on 109 degree lobe centers, requires 0.160" lash pads, retainers, competition valve springs and new rocker arms.

     

    99996-E1036 L7 RALLY Camshaft. 475 lift and 270 degrees - 

    eground on 109 degree lobe centers, requires 0.160" lash pads.

     

    I only checked four or five years for the Catalogs.. and there may have been very minor changes over the years. Nissan USA had local Cam Producers do the regrinds to Nissan's spec.'s - Thus the 99996 numbers.

     

    I've ran both the SALOM and RALLY regrinds in L24/L28's. For the street the RALLY cam gave a little more lower end power. you could feel it around 3000RPM.   The SALOM cam didn't seem to wake up until you passed 4500RPM then came on more suddenly.  Engines were running Nissan Flat Tops {euro spec with 2cc raised area} at about 9.5 to 9.8 compression. Triple Webers.. Ran with stock exhaust manifold and/or headers, didn't seem to matter.

     

    Oh - How Rare?  Not really, several current cam producers can duplicate it, or sell you something better.

     

     

     

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    I wonder - could we find 2 or 3 Datsun 240Z's in equal condition today - that the owners are willing to sell for $20K to $25K ?  I've had a couple guys looking for the past year - they haven't had any luck yet. They might be bidding on this car - I don't know. I know several guys that have these Z's - I don't know one willing to sell at that price.

     

    Granted, I wouldn't rate this Z as a #1 Condition example, but you might be able to bring it up to a low end #2 Condition example with a little more attention to detail and a little more work. The undercarriage would need significant work - big mistake to put that much into the car - and black out the undercarriage, and get black paint on everything. Fine for a driver, not so for a Museum Quality example. 

     

    Still - if you started with a very solid and complete example - you'd be in that $12K today. Then duplicate the work done on this Z - and you would spend another $30K, if you did a lot of the work yourself. Send it to a professional Restoration shop - pay the $75.00 to $95.00 per hour for labor, plus the $125.00 per hour for mechanical work and you'd be writing a check for at least $70K in labor alone. Now add the current cost of all the NOS parts you'd need, plus body work and paint. Easy to get up to $90K SPENT...

     

    Someone in Europe or Japan might recognize a deal and be willing to buy ahead of the market.. I have no idea what the owner would take - but for anything under $45K today, I'd tell him to hold it another year.

     

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    Carl, looks like you can click on the little light switch in the upper left of the edit box.  It will toggle between WYSIWYG mode and the "code" mode.  You will be able to split the single author quotes using the quote command.

    Hi Mike - thanks. That icon was so small I couldn't see what it was. Now that I know - I can use it. LOL

     

    I added a split here as an example.  If you don't like writing in code mode, you can add your splits and then toggle back and forth.

     

    Code Mode works for me.

     

    You've always been able to edit someone else's quote, even in the old software, unfortunately.

    You could? I guess I never tried that before. I was just taking this new S/W for a spin.. to learn how it was going to work - and provide feedback

     

    I'm looking into the quoted text issue today.

    Great - thanks..

    I agree - the VIN on the dash doesn't look right - Looks like it was made with a Label Machine - and it looks like someone put a 72 Dash and Center Console in the car.   That or the VIN on the firewall doesn't match the dash?  Wonder if it has the original Data Plate on the drivers door jam.  The whole car looks pretty sketchy..  It certainly isn't a 1971 - has the 70 gas lid door..

     

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    Text is now black, I hope you'll stop complaining now.

     

     

     

    Made a few tonight.  And, for you I increased the font to the 14pt size.  Now don't ask me for anything else.

     

    I'll think about a solution on the theme...  maybe what we need is a few to pick from and then vote on the final design.  I don't really want to support more than a single theme because changes can be a bitch...  (this font thing is a good example)

     

    Anyway, good ideas, keep 'em coming.

     

    m

     

     

    OK - see what I mean?  I made a few edits to your original Post...

     

    I was able to increase the font size in the Reply Editor - I'll see if it shows up that way.

     

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

     

    Edit #1 cjb - - OK the font size of the quoted text was increased - - only it is still somewhat "grayed out".. 

    Text is now black, I actually agree that it's much better as black.  Somehow I didn't notice but this is a lot better.

     

    CJB - - I agree.. it is much better.

     

     

     

    Made a few tonight.  And, for you I increased the font to the 14pt size.  Both of these ideas are actually very good ideas.  I couldn't find the font size quickly but after a bit of code searching I found it.

     

    CJB - - - I appreciate that - even if it wasn't for me

     

    I'll think about a solution on the theme...  maybe what we need is a few to pick from and then vote on the final design.  I don't really want to support more than a single theme because changes can be a bitch...  (this font thing is a good example)

     

    Anyway, good ideas, keep 'em coming.

     

    m

     

    Here I tried to break the quoted text into blocks - like we used to be able to do. I'm afraid that inserting carriage returns doesn't stop the quoted text - - but allows you to edit it. Might not be a good thing..

    Carl

    Text is now black, I actually agree that it's much better as black.  Somehow I didn't notice but this is a lot better.

     

    Made a few tonight.  And, for you I increased the font to the 14pt size.  Both of these ideas are actually very good ideas.  I couldn't find the font size quickly but after a bit of code searching I found it.

     

    m

    Much Better font size and color.  But will the quoted text be larger as well? In the Posts above it seems to still be very small and light.

    Carl B.

     

    First Edit: cub

    I guess my question was answered - in my own Post. LOL  Can you work on the quoted text size and color as well?   Also I don't see the hypertext that used to lead and follow the quoted text.  Is it possible to still break quoted text into two or more blocks; and comment on them individually?  I'll try that next..

    4. When all is said and done, you may wish that you'd just pulled the dash first. It might just end up taking the same amount of time overall and it sure makes getting to the heater and blower a lot easier (for both removal and reinstallation). Also might make removal of the glovebox liner unnecessary (not sure about this -- maybe someone else can comment). Pulling the dash will also give you an opportunity to inspect and clean some key wiring harness connectors and replace all of the gauge lights (v. difficult to do with the dash in place, and nearly impossible for speedo and tach if your dash has a cap installed).

    I would recommend Option #4. If you have one person to help - pulling the dash is really a far easier and better way to go. Trust me - this is not something you want to do upside-down cramped up under the dash. Even if you take the passenger seat out, so you can get under there - It is no fun when you are 25 and shear frustration when you are 65+. Pull the dash, do a complete "refresh" job on everything under there - Do it all once and be done. Hire a young helper.. maybe you can find a local Z Car enthusiast near you.

    FWIW,

    Carl B. pushing 70...

    I think that as you get older - you are ABLE to pay for higher quality and better service.

    With the disclaimer - - There is no longer the more or less direct correlation between Price and Quality, that there used to be several decades ago.

    Quality is defined by the Customer.

    • Like 1

    Who in their right mind would sell that Z for $2500.00? Expect family members to sue you - saying that their relative was out of his mind. That or Phil Spector will show up claiming it was his… LOL

    looks like a real jewel..

    Carl B.

    Cheap Junk - comes from the "businesses" that buy it from the factory - and resell it in the retail market.

    High Quality - comes from the businesses that buy it from the factory - and resell it in the retail market.

    The truth is that an ever growing number of Americans make their purchase decisions, based not on the quality of the products - but upon the quality of the advertising generating sales. They make their purchasing decisions based on ease of purchase and price.

    Going to Home Depot is "ease of purchase". You can get everything you need in one location. In decades past you might have to go to the Hardware Store, the Lumber Yard, the Electrical Supply Company, the Plumbing Supply Company etc etc - - just to get one small home improvement project done.

    Going to Home Depot instead of Lowes - might be a decision between "ease of purchase" or "lower price". So Home Depot and Lowes are always looking for lower priced items, and they are always building stores in the same towns/locations.

    Bottom Line - it isn't Chinese Junk. As long as price remains the main element in purchasing.

    China is building their own Space Station. In my opinion the highest quality personal computers, smart phones and portable music players - Apples products are almost all made in china. Yes, up front they seem to cost a bit more - but everything I've bought from them has been very reliable and all the hardware has easily out lived the technical life of its software. Because Apple buys high quality Chinese manufactured products - and resells them in the retail market.

    Harbor Freight - plays both sides of the game. Much of what they sell is junk, some of what they sell is actually very high quality. For years now Harbor Freight's "US General" tool boxes have offered quality as good or better than other major manufacturers offerings - at half the price. This while old line, well known products were being made cheaper and cheaper - Sears Craftsman brand has all but destroyed itself by buying Chinese Cheap Junk - instead of buying much higher quality Chinese Products.

    Just like Japan before it - sooner or later - more and more businesses will start to buy high quality products from Chinese Manufacturing Plants - and resell them in the retail market in America.

    So if your fuel pump or security system are cheap junk - call it like it is - list the name of the company that is selling it.

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    I don't know a lot about what to look for in a restoration but the gap of the front wheels did catch my eye. Seems like the right wheel is further forward than the left, even though the wheels both seem to be pointed straight ahead. No pictures from underneath either. This would make me look closer on any car, even a cheap one.

    Believe it or not - but that difference in R & L front wheels - was very common. Most people didn't notice it - until they went to a larger wheel/tire size.. LOL Some of it could be adjusted out by shifting the lower finisher panels over a bit - but it was still there only to a lessor extent.

    Also agree - any car like this should be presented with clear pictures of the undercarriage.

    Although not really a Concours Restoration - it might check out to be a very nice 240Z - - but I'm not seeing anything close to $38K in todays market. With the minor issues - something closer to $20K might not be too bad.. {if the undercarriage holds up to inspection}.

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    Mine has a plastic fan and is from 5/71, should it then have had the metal fan instead ?

    Yes - as original equipment production in 5/71 had metal fans. However, given the reasons for the change to the lighter weight plastic fan's - It is a good idea to replace the metal fan's with the plastic one's for any street driven Z. The plastic fan might cost you a couple points in a Stock Class at a Judged Show…but it reduces the risk of early water pump failure - or damage to the radiator/hood etc if the metal fan breaks away..

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    Back to the Original Post - from the pictures provided - that looks like a very solid example - and would most likely be fun to fully restore at this point. It will be interesting to see where the bidding winds up at the end of the auction…$10K would not surprise me. It is getting very hard to find un-molested 240Z's in easily restorable condition. I hope someone we know gets the car and just cleans it up - to see what it really looks like.

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    I have never seen any Nissan produced literature that announces anything like a new or updated series II.

    Chris:

    We avoid using Nissan's terms - because they allow confusion as to the specific's of the exact model being discussed.

    I'm pretty sure most of the Model Introduction Service Bulletins for the 240Z's have been shown/discussed here. Here is the cover page introducing the "1971 late model" or as we call it the Series II cars.

    That way we can tell if a 240Z Sold/Titled or advertised for sale used as a 1971 Model - is in fact the first or second model sold/titled as a 1971.

    1971IntroCover.jpg

    FWIW,

    Carl B.

    The fact that Nissan and their Authorized Dealers here in the US sold the same model 240Z as 1970 and 1971 "Model Year" vehicles; then introduced yet another "Late Model Year 1971" vehicle - - - should make the reason clear as to why there is no "Official Nissan" designation that points out the difference. They seem to have made ever effort to hide the differences at the time.

    While the average buyer didn't have a clue that while they were paying for what they thought was the latest model i.e. 1971 - they were in fact getting the previous years model with no changes, other than to the MSPR. The buyers that actually waited for 240Z's produce in Feb. 1971 actually got what they paid for - a newer model with several improvements.

    So to avoid the confusion caused by having the same model being sold/titled as 1970 and 1971, then having a second model sold/titled as 1971 - Yes, knowledgable enthusiast apply the more specific terms of Series I and Series II to these vehicles.

    Metal Fan's were replaced on the 1972 Model Year 240Z's here in the North American Market.

    FWIW,

    Carl B.
Remove Ads

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.