HS30-H

WHY NOT? I repeat - Bristol Cars Ltd have been buying back cars from customers and the used car trade, completely restoring them in their own factory, and then selling them through their own showroom and sales network for many years. What part of that do you not understand? If that does not trump the Nissan project then why not? Anyone claiming that the NMC USA project was a "World first" has just got to be cracked ( or a politician ). I invite you to think of that "Factory Restoration" quote from the viewpoint of my old friend and drinking partner Mr Tsukamoto, who actually worked on the S30-series Z production line ( yeah - in JAPAN ). I think he'd be rather nonplussed at the gauche way the word "Factory" is being used. Is this just an American perspective thing? Can you not imagine how silly and inaccurate the descriptions of the NMC USA resto project sound to anyone outside the Z collector / enthusiast loop? I'll take you to the Bristol cars showroom here in London, and invite you to explain to the sales staff there just how ".....a manufacturer had never purchased cars for resale through its own sales facilities." Why not "roughly"? If other manufacturers have been doing roughly the same thing in their own different way then I think it has relevance to the discussion. RR, Bentley, Aston Martin and others have all undertaken variations on the same theme in the past. Bristol Cars are STILL doing it, and in an arguably 'purer' way. All the talk about the Nissan project makes it sound as though its a total and complete world first, which is bullshit. Of course it was a sales / marketing exercise ( a very good one ) - who said it was anything else? "Factory Restoration" a stretch of the imagination? Stretch of credibility more like. This is the kind of thing that makes us all look silly. You'll see even less of me on this forum if you keep coming up with sub-Beck nonsense like this. Is there something being piped into Florida's water? I ask again, why does the Bristol example not count? Is it because they actually DID and DO restore the cars in their own Factory? But they categorically DO NOT represent a unique chapter or world first in the story of the automobile or the automobile industry. I agree that the cars were restored to a fantastic standard, and I take my hat off to the private businesses that were contracted by NMC USA to undertake the work. I'm NOT dissing the cars or the people that restored them, and I still think the project was a stroke of marketing genius; the column inches and publicity they got from it represented a huge return over whatever they spent. But it was NOT a world first however way you look at it. Try wriggling out of that argument with semantics or twisting the story, but it won't wash outside the USA. Its probably too late to eliminate the Goertz bullshit ( we seem to have at least one Goertz lie in the UK automotive press every month ) but if we aren't careful we will have more myths to contend with in the future; this "Factory Restoration" talk is total nonsense that should have been nipped in the bud. I ask again, where did it start and who started it? All it does is make Z enthusiasts / historians look stupid.

Christopher, I'm sorry, but I can't see where the word "factory" ( sometimes with a capital F I've noticed ) comes into it. Since when did NMC USA = "Factory"? As far as I am aware, this project was the brainchild of NMC USA ( as opposed to NMC Japan ). That's not the same thing at all, is it? 'NMC USA sponsored / sanctioned restoration program' would be less misleading I think. Maybe not quite enough buzz for the copywriters though. Tagging the word "Factory" onto it conjures up a different picture altogether - at least to my mind. Its being used much too casually for me. Look at the title of this thread. This is categorically NOT TRUE. You make it sound very cut and dried. However, I think you might have taken NMC USA's advertising men a little too literally. Manufacturers here in the UK have been doing roughly the same thing for many years. In fact, if you want to look back into the early part of the Twentieth Century you would see that such a practice was relatively common. I'm sure other manufacturers in other countries were doing it too. Rolls Royce, Bentley, Aston Martin and Lotus spring to mind. Aston Martin have been doing it since the '70's for sure. I've even ridden in a Factory refurb of a DB5 that was for sale at their Newport Pagnell Factory sales showroom. For a cast iron example I'd cite Bristol. They have been - and in fact still do - buy back customer cars and refurb them for sale to other customers. This is not bespoke refurb for an existing owner ( although this too is offered ) but the systematic buy-back, refurb and resale of old cars through its own manufacturing and sales system. Now THAT is what I would call a "Factory Restoration"........ Maybe Bristol doesn't count though, eh? How many Americans have heard of Bristol Cars? We are - after all - now in the "New American Century", or so I hear. Nope. Just trying to make what ( I think ) is a valid and relevant point. Which seems to be less and less important on this forum recently. Alan T. ( No Cheerios please, I'm strictly a Muesli guy )

I was told they were on a '73 Fairlady Z-L Lachlan. I don't know how you can make a judgement about whether he was a careful driver or not. The "huge dent" might not have been his fault at all....... You also don't know what his circumstances were with regard to affording the wheels. I hope you're not 'looking a gift horse in the mouth'? These wheels were cheap as chips at one time; I remember seeing a really nice pair of 'R' types being used as plant-pot holders in the front yard of a house just down the road from where I used to live in Tokyo.

So when people write "Factory Restored", they don't actually mean what they are implying? Right. Where did this bad habit start? I remember seeing UK newspaper and car magazine reports around the time the project was first announced, and not all of the journalists seemed to be in full command of the facts. Many of the articles implied that the cars were to be sent back to Japan and at least one ( I remember choking on my morning tea ) CATEGORICALLY stated that the cars indeed were to be shipped back to Nissan in Japan. Looks like loose lips sunk ships. Subsequently I saw more accurate reporting of the exercise, but this "Factory Restored" tag still sticks with a lot of people. I've seen it plenty on this site, where people should know better. Where did it come from?

gruvyz, Congratulations, and welcome to the world of early Z ownership. Special congratulations on the purchase of a tangible piece of NMC USA's advertising budget. Welcome too to the sad and lonely cul-de-sac that I inhabit. Its a place where curmudgeonly sticklers roam, muttering under their breath that the only Nissan "Factory" your car saw was over thirty years ago, and was located in Japan and not the United States of America. :paranoid: I know I've whined about it in the past, but is this "Factory Restoration" tag set in stone now? Is all the other nonsense about it being a "World first" also now 'fact'? *shuffles back into darkened room and closes door with a loud clang*

Well, if you have one end of the return spring attached to the tab on the body, then - as far as I remember - the other end needs to be attached to the U-shaped hanger ( Nissan call it the "Equaliser" ) that the centre section of the handbrake cable sits in. Can you see a small slot on the Equaliser, right where the clevis pin runs through it?

As 2ManyZs pointed out, there is a little tab on the body. Its a small triangular shape with rounded corners, and its pushed out of the pressing which the Handbrake brackets are attached to. Its so small that you might be missing it............. This pic should help:

Original ones were 'Pot Metal' / 'Mazak' castings. Like most of the emblems, they were later changed to plastic - but they were originally metal. The metal one on my ZG is starting to show its age; its deteriorating in the way that Mazak loves to - pimpling up and going dull........... Like me. Alan T.

Hi Steve, Just PM'd you back.

You should have said that you were talking about the 'Short Case' R200 rather than the 'Long Case' R200 in the beginning. It would have saved time. But I still don't understand the question. The internal parts of the R32-type R200 are not designed to fit in the earlier ( long case ) R200, and you would struggle to fit the complete R32-type diff in your Z. What is it you are thinking of doing exactly? If you want to have an LSD-equipped R200 with a suitable ratio that is a virtual bolt-in for your early Z, then I recommend that you look for the earlier long case type and forget about the one in your pictures.

Straight-on shot with the rear cover off: