Whatever you say; it's your thread so I guess you can supply the definitions.

The 'willy-nilly' emoticon:

See ya!

Edited September 7, 200915 yr by sblake01

I think of the Z as an art form in styling.

First, I'm in my mid 50's, so my perspective may be a bit skewed...

That said, I fully agree with the definition of a "sportscar" as being a two seat convertible or GT.

I think the Corvette is certainly a sports car, but agree with the opinion that sport sedans are a different class.

Back in the day, BMW 2002's and 510's were not considered sports cars, and I think that definition still applies. I say this with full knowledge that many sport sedans like the WRX and EVO will outperform many contempary "sports cars".

Just my 2 cents...

They don'r need a lot of HP, but they do need to handle well

The Mini Cooper will fit for you then, Julio. It doesn't have much horsepower, but does handle well. It has little in terms of amenities, but was very enjoyable.

There is a nice article on the Wikipedia website concernin sportscars, and the differences between sportscars and other associated types.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_car

The wikipedia sports car write-up was an interesting read. Thanks for that.

I've driven an original Mini Cooper as well as the current incarnation. I consider them "fun" sport sedans that feel like a street legal go-cart.

It seems this is a purists' question, and the criteria only serve to exclude others from the club. Can't we cast a broad net and say that sports cars are used for competition driving, whether on a curvy course, a drag strip, or in the mud?

Dunno, maybe the bar could be set higher: A *real* sportscar has only one seat and no doors.

Edited September 8, 200915 yr by FastWoman