Jump to content

IGNORED

Read by wait to post...What original part of the S30 has the poorest design?


hls30.com

WHat one original part(or system) of the S30 has the poorest design  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. WHat one original part(or system) of the S30 has the poorest design

    • The freakin' spindle pins!
    • The fastening system at the bottom of the fenders.
    • The heater valve
      0
    • The seals on the body (hose and taillight seals)
    • the Shifter bushings
    • the Hatch
    • The electrical system
    • The paint
      0
    • Water pump fastening system
      0
    • The crank shaft pulley fastener system
      0
    • The half shafts
      0
    • the headlight buckets
    • The weather Seal system
    • The Previous Owner System
    • You just don't have a clue it is the ...


Recommended Posts

I haven't really gotten deep enough or owned my car long enough to see any of these issue as real problems. That and the PO took pretty good care of the car, but it appearsr to me that most of this is the results of compromise done due to design changes and an effort to keep the cost of the car down to increase sales against the muscle and sports cars of the time, including the low grade steel used in the construction of the body iteself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How about the poor quality plastic used in the dashes, where about 95% of them crack within 5 years after leaving the factory? :stupid:

From my experience (now 36 years of ownership) - I didn't see the dashes cracking until they were at least 15 years old. I have two 1972 240-Z's with still perfect dashes.. I'm the original owner on one, and the second owner on the other. Both simply have had "reasonable" care.

Given the market price and then current market competition - the plastics used in the Z were far superior to most.

FWIW

Carl B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely easy to look at things like the rear drum brakes and wonder why they didn't come with discs, but in the early 70's, what cars DID have rear discs standard? With a follow up question being what price range were those cars in compared to a Z? You can still buy cars NOW with drums in the rear. Also, the drums work, so I hardly think that counts as a poorly designed part. I would agree with Jmortensen that the front dif mount was a bad design even when new, but saying things like hatch seals and thin sheet metal (rust) were poorly designed after 30 years doesn't really count (with the exception of the cowl drainage, that maybe could have been a little better). These things worked when new, and work when replaced, so I argue that the design was sound, but the maintenance left something to be desired. The spindle pins work, they are just a PIA to remove (but were they when new? I don't really know). Maybe I'm reading the question differently, but I thought it was supposed to set the car in the context of the 1970's when rating the merits of a particular component? And that one about the crank pulley, how else would you fasten a crank pulley down? That's the same way as every car I've ever worked on: a large bolt with a keyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.