Jump to content

IGNORED

Eliminating the Coolant Sensor


TomoHawk

Recommended Posts

Has anyone tried substituting a fixed resistor for the coolant sensor?  The engine will still operate, but you may need to make sure the  coolant was within the operational temperature range to get the full performance, which is what we do with these classic engines, anyway.

The goal is to reduce the amount of wiring on top of the intake manifold.

 I suppose you could use an adjustable resistance, for special conditions, like we do to richen the mixture, which is in addition to the coolant sensor.

I think that's the only resistance the ECU needs, besides the air temperature from the Airflow meter, and the airflow signal the from AFM itself.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


One of the "tricks" that guys used to do in combination with the turbo AFM was to put a small potentiometer for variable resistance in line from the coolant temperature sensor so the could adjust the richness a bit. My personal feeling is that you're better off stock. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, JSM said:

You can tuck them and run under the fuel rail and out the back. I was actually looking at using a injector wire holder from a BMW but figured a nice wire loom would be better.

 

 

I was planning on diverting the wires straight back to the firewall,but not under the fuel rail.  I'd like to get   the sensors, wires, etc.  sorted out, and possibly even lengthened,  before moving them.  I too thought of pinching a wire frame from somewhere. I'd rather not remove the webbing from between the runners in case a fuel hose might leak or drip fuel on the exhaust manifold.

When reading about airflow meters I noticed that some 1970s BWs had the AFM 'on its side' meaning the black cover was facing the bonnet.  That would make the connector accessible, and better protected from rain & dirt from underneath. I think you'd only need to make a large angle bracket of some kind.

BTW, the BMW AFM has a special resistance track at the lower-flow end.  It's supposed to improve the mixture at low revs.

s-l225.jpg

Edited by TomoHawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Guidelines. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.