.JPG.20b916cffb7800ea2f6f180decb34fa9.JPG "58b22fa487904-DSC-0745(3).JPG")
.JPG.a3a4be3180229ada89f535a930c20911.JPG)
.JPG.0596f0e7be97ccd16b46e15e8318c11f.JPG)
.JPG.43a96b2ec7b09af3b5d77d16dc31b218.JPG)
.JPG.15ef6c2ed3ed6cac81ca1593f45e4820.JPG)
.JPG.82461bf337a1491e261a943b8981e629.JPG)
58b22fa487904-DSC-0745(3).JPG
- 1,289 views
- View 1971datsun240z's images
This is the first car I ever bought in 1979. Drove this car till 1996. Stored it till 2 years ago then I restored it. Won first place in my class in Feb 2017 at the Dallas Auto Rama.
Photo Information
- Taken with NIKON CORPORATION NIKON D7000
- Focal Length 98 mm
- Exposure Time 10/2500
- f Aperture f/5.6
- ISO Speed 180
-
Gallery Statistics
-
-
Image Comments
-
-
Well I decided to go for it -
Went with 42's and a TWM manifold. Still lots to sort out, but Ill start another thread on it somewhere and link it back here. Rought calculations hopefully put it in between an OER setup and a Mikuni PHH setup $wise.
-
By duffymahoney · Posted
I would probably do them in pairs, then each pair goes to a common shaft.
-
Part of running a single shared throttle shaft was for a super clean look- like how datsun_tokyo linked above has it.
I also still haven’t decided on the manifold- but was planning on the TWM one- seems to be the cleanest and allows me to run without all the linkages.
With that said I’m interested- I’ll shoot you PM.
-
By duffymahoney · Posted
I have common under mount bar mount I could sell you, with either teflon or brass bushings. You would need arms, but it would be the best for actually balancing them. Just a thought.
-
Recommended Comments
There are no comments to display.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now